FFEM vs. FUTY
FFEM (Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF) and FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Fidelity, while FUTY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. Over the past year, FFEM returned 63.82% vs 12.10% for FUTY. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFEM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FUTY.
Performance
FFEM vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 31.03% return, which is significantly higher than FUTY's 3.78% return.
FFEM
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 31.03%
- 6M
- 34.56%
- 1Y
- 63.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTY
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 12.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
FFEM vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 31.03% | 40.03% | -2.27% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 3.78% | 16.40% | -6.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFEM and FUTY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFEM vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank
FFEM
FUTY
FFEM vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFEM | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.15 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 1.36 | +3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.77 | 3.05 | +15.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFEM | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | 0.85 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.14 | 0.55 | +1.58 |
Drawdowns
FFEM vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum FUTY drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and FUTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFEM | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -36.44% | +20.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -8.93% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -6.72% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -6.03% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 3.98% | -0.57% |
Volatility
FFEM vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) at 5.52%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFEM | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.04% | 5.52% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.86% | 11.38% | +7.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.63% | 14.34% | +7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 17.08% | +4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 19.05% | +2.99% |
FFEM vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFEM vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison
FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than FUTY's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 1.24% | 1.59% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.60% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFEM and FUTY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFEM has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to FUTY (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFEM dropped -16.29% vs FUTY's -36.44%.
On 1-year performance, FFEM leads with 63.82% vs 12.10% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FUTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FFEM has performed better with a 63.82% return vs 12.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FFEM.
FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.24% for FFEM.
FFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FFEM and 0.08% for FUTY.
FFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFEM and FUTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer