FFEM vs. FETH
FFEM (Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FFEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Fidelity, while FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. Over the past year, FFEM returned 68.49% vs -31.75% for FETH. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFEM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FETH.
Performance
FFEM vs. FETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 33.06% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.
FFEM
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 9.73%
- YTD
- 33.06%
- 6M
- 36.71%
- 1Y
- 68.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.77%
- 1Y
- -31.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFEM vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 33.06% | 40.03% | -2.27% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -39.45% | -11.37% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFEM and FETH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFEM vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank
FFEM
FETH
FFEM vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFEM | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 0.97 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | -0.51 | +5.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.18 | -0.84 | +21.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFEM | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | -0.47 | +3.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.21 | -0.41 | +2.63 |
Drawdowns
FFEM vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and FETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFEM | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -64.00% | +47.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -62.95% | +49.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -62.95% | +61.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -32.73% | +30.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 37.82% | -34.41% |
Volatility
FFEM vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) is 9.03%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFEM | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 9.99% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 46.01% | -27.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.56% | 68.50% | -46.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 72.27% | -50.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 72.27% | -50.25% |
FFEM vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFEM vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison
FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 1.22% | 1.59% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFEM and FETH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FFEM (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFEM dropped -16.29% vs FETH's -64.00%.
On 1-year performance, FFEM leads with 68.49% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FFEM has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FFEM has performed better with a 68.49% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FFEM.
FFEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
FFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FFEM and 0.00% for FETH.
FFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFEM and FETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer