PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFEM vs. DIEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFEM vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFEM vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFEM having a 6.04% return and DIEM slightly lower at 5.94%.


FFEM

1D
4.43%
1M
-7.72%
YTD
6.04%
6M
11.84%
1Y
41.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIEM

1D
0.57%
1M
-6.23%
YTD
5.94%
6M
11.22%
1Y
34.79%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFEM vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFEM vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFEM
FFEM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFEM vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFEMDIEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

1.90

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

2.53

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

2.86

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.69

11.39

+0.30

FFEM vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEM and DIEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFEMDIEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.90

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

0.42

+1.10

Correlation

The correlation between FFEM and DIEM is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FFEM vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than DIEM's 2.88% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FFEM
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF
1.54%1.59%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.88%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%

Drawdowns

FFEM vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and DIEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFEMDIEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-38.61%

+22.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-12.33%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.74%

-8.58%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-9.86%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.10%

+0.43%

Volatility

FFEM vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) at 8.54%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFEMDIEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.96%

8.54%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

13.44%

+3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.16%

18.44%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

16.38%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.13%

17.40%

+3.73%