FFEB vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFEB (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFEB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. FFEB is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFEB returned 11.09%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

FFEB vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFEB achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.

FFEB

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 7.65%
• 6M: 8.55%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: 16.35%
• 5Y*: 11.09%
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 64.22%
• 6M: 60.70%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFEB vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February	7.65%	13.76%	16.64%	19.95%	-7.51%	16.26%	9.83%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	64.22%	-11.86%	8.18%	-0.97%	27.57%	63.71%	-53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FFEB and OILK is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2020	0.14

The correlation between FFEB and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FFEB vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFEB	OILK
Technology	36.2%	-
Financial Services	11.9%	-
Communication Services	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	100.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	8.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

FFEB vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFEB

FFEB Risk / Return Rank: 82
FFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 86

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFEB vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFEB	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.06	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	2.59	+1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.34	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	3.42	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.01	6.91	+11.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFEB vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEB and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFEB	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.06	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.59	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.12	+0.75

Drawdowns

FFEB vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEB drawdown since its inception was -22.81%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEB and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFEB	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.81%	-83.76%	+60.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.73%	-17.35%	+11.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.89%	-23.42%	+11.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.85%	-34.69%	+20.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-3.66%	+3.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-32.61%	+30.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	8.56%	-7.48%

Volatility

FFEB vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) is 1.24%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that FFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFEB	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	10.44%	-9.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.56%	23.26%	-17.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.12%	28.75%	-21.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.81%	30.12%	-19.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.75%	35.97%	-22.22%

FFEB vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFEB vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

FFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.18%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFEB and OILK in my portfolio?

FFEB and OILK have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFEB or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to FFEB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFEB dropped -22.81% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, FFEB or OILK?

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 11.09% for FFEB. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, FFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFEB or OILK?

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFEB or OILK?

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFEB or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for FFEB.

What is the main difference between FFEB and OILK?

FFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FFEB and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.