FFDI vs. FID
FFDI (Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, FFDI returned 12.65% vs 23.28% for FID. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFDI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
FFDI vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFDI achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than FID's 8.56% return.
FFDI
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 12.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
FFDI vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFDI Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF | 6.62% | 26.66% | -2.09% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | -2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFDI and FID is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FFDI and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFDI vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
FFDI
FID
FFDI vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFDI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.41 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 2.62 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | 9.14 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFDI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 2.30 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.39 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
FFDI vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFDI drawdown since its inception was -14.39%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFDI and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFDI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.39% | -39.79% | +25.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.85% | -8.93% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -1.11% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.14% | -8.47% | +6.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.55% | +0.59% |
Volatility
FFDI vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF (FFDI) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that FFDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFDI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 3.00% | +3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 8.12% | +6.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.95% | 10.16% | +6.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 17.04% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 18.96% | -0.29% |
FFDI vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFDI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFDI vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
FFDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFDI Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF | 2.07% | 2.16% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFDI and FID have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFDI has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFDI dropped -14.39% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 1-year performance, FID leads with 23.28% vs 12.65% for FFDI. On fees, FFDI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FID has performed better with a 23.28% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FFDI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.07% for FFDI.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFDI and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFDI and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer