PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFBSX vs. FRQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFBSX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FFBSX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFBSX achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.51% return.


FFBSX

1D
-2.20%
1M
0.75%
YTD
11.82%
6M
11.13%
1Y
25.94%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*

FRQAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.30%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*
4.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFBSX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFBSX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
11.82%22.66%13.61%20.44%-19.07%16.21%17.89%9.03%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.51%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FFBSX and FRQAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.80

The correlation between FFBSX and FRQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFBSX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFBSX
FFBSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FFBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FFBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFBSX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FFBSX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFBSXFRQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.41

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.56

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.41

10.69

+1.72

FFBSX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFBSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FRQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFBSX and FRQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFBSX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, smaller than the maximum FRQAX drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFBSX and FRQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFBSXFRQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.28%

-38.22%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-3.46%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-5.27%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.71%

-17.24%

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-0.43%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-4.56%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

0.83%

+1.40%

Volatility

FFBSX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FFBSX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.66%. This indicates that FFBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFBSXFRQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

1.66%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

3.67%

+8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.84%

4.35%

+9.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

5.59%

+9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

5.29%

+11.97%

FFBSX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFBSX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFBSX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

FFBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than FRQAX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFBSX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.30%2.48%2.83%1.93%5.26%6.83%3.44%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.99%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFBSX and FRQAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFBSX has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to FRQAX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFBSX dropped -31.28% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.

FRQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFBSX and FRQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer