PortfoliosLab logo
FFBSX vs. FXAIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FFBSX and FXAIX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential

Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer

Try portfolio optimization now

Performance

FFBSX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FFBSX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-10.56%
-16.89%
SCZ
IWM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FFBSX:

0.36

FXAIX:

0.69

Sortino Ratio

FFBSX:

0.58

FXAIX:

0.99

Omega Ratio

FFBSX:

1.07

FXAIX:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

FFBSX:

0.56

FXAIX:

0.96

Martin Ratio

FFBSX:

1.75

FXAIX:

3.17

Ulcer Index

FFBSX:

2.61%

FXAIX:

3.03%

Daily Std Dev

FFBSX:

12.62%

FXAIX:

13.98%

Max Drawdown

FFBSX:

-31.65%

FXAIX:

-33.79%

Current Drawdown

FFBSX:

-5.23%

FXAIX:

-7.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFBSX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's -3.26% return.


FFBSX

YTD

0.38%

1M

-2.72%

6M

-2.56%

1Y

4.99%

5Y*

11.84%

10Y*

N/A

FXAIX

YTD

-3.26%

1M

-2.93%

6M

-0.02%

1Y

10.42%

5Y*

19.82%

10Y*

12.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund

Fidelity 500 Index Fund

FFBSX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFBSX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FFBSX: current value is 0.49%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FFBSX: 0.49%
Expense ratio chart for FXAIX: current value is 0.02%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FXAIX: 0.02%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFBSX vs. FXAIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFBSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFBSX is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFBSX is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFBSX is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFBSX is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFBSX is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFBSX is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FXAIX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FXAIX is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FXAIX is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FXAIX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FXAIX is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FXAIX is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FFBSX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FFBSX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for SCZ, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
SCZ: -0.24
IWM: -0.50
The chart of Sortino ratio for SCZ, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.00
SCZ: -0.22
IWM: -0.57
The chart of Omega ratio for SCZ, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.50
SCZ: 0.97
IWM: 0.93
The chart of Calmar ratio for SCZ, currently valued at -0.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
SCZ: -0.21
IWM: -0.44
The chart of Martin ratio for SCZ, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
SCZ: -0.76
IWM: -1.59

The current FFBSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFBSX and FXAIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.24
-0.50
SCZ
IWM

Dividends

FFBSX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

FFBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than FXAIX's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014

Drawdowns

FFBSX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.65%, smaller than the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFBSX and FXAIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-17.93%
-24.86%
SCZ
IWM

Volatility

FFBSX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FFBSX) is NaN%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that FFBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
7.86%
9.85%
SCZ
IWM

User Portfolios with FFBSX or FXAIX


SF
10%
YTD
AAPL
MSFT
NVDA
RHM.DE
test1
9%
YTD
TM
RHM.DE
AIR.PA
SOXX
AMZN
GOOG
MSFT
ERJ
BAB.L
CSL
LRCX
SAN
1211.HK
AGRO
1 / 502

Recent discussions

Transactional Portfolio Use

I am trying to understand how to make the best use of transactional portfolios. At first I thought it is useful when tracking the performance of a self-managed fund. You add cash to it, transact in equities, adding each transaction to the portfolio. It then shows you its performance wrt. to a benchmark. The broker does this for you anyway, but the whole reason I started evaluating Portfolioslab is so that I can separate my single broker account into thematic baskets ("thematic funds") and track their performance individually.

The transactional portfolio in Portfolioslab does not seem to work that way. It does not consider the changes in cash position, ie. any profit/loss made on equity transactions. It does not seem to be suited for track the assets of a fund, so to speak. What good is transactional portfolio then?

EG

May 14, 24 Posted in general
558

How often do you rebase the trends portfolio?

Is there a way to know when the portfolio is being rebased and how its composition changes over time? I want to track when new stocks are added to the portfolio or removed.

Hedge Cat

October 17, 23 Posted in general
1K

Basis of calculations: historical or modelled?

Hi,

I am new to Portfolioslab. I cannot find any statement describing whether returns and heat maps of users' and lazy's portfolios are based on actual historical data, or are simply modelled on the basis of current portfolio composition.

I would greatly appreciate a clarification.

Thanks

Luca

November 12, 23 Posted in general
679