FFACX vs. TIBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX).
FFACX is an actively managed fund by Franklin. It was launched on Aug 15, 2003. TIBAX is managed by Thornburg. It was launched on Dec 23, 2002.
Performance
FFACX vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFACX vs. TIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFACX Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C | -3.35% | 15.09% | 12.06% | 11.99% | -12.43% | 10.89% | 0.71% | 16.90% | -10.54% | 10.44% |
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund | 7.98% | 36.62% | 13.23% | 18.01% | -7.95% | 20.08% | -0.67% | 17.72% | -4.54% | 14.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFACX achieves a -3.35% return, which is significantly lower than TIBAX's 7.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FFACX has underperformed TIBAX with an annualized return of 5.93%, while TIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.
FFACX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- -3.35%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 11.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 5.93%
TIBAX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 15.33%
- 1Y
- 35.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFACX vs. TIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFACX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFACX vs. TIBAX — Risk / Return Rank
FFACX
TIBAX
FFACX vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFACX | TIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 3.33 | -2.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 4.24 | -2.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.74 | -0.51 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 4.10 | -2.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.17 | 20.22 | -14.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFACX | TIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 3.33 | -2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.36 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.87 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.77 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFACX and TIBAX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFACX vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison
FFACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, less than TIBAX's 5.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFACX Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C | 4.68% | 4.52% | 0.39% | 0.90% | 3.57% | 0.45% | 6.72% | 2.24% | 2.38% | 2.21% | 1.48% | 2.17% |
TIBAX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund | 5.30% | 5.64% | 5.44% | 4.67% | 5.62% | 5.10% | 4.11% | 4.23% | 4.49% | 4.22% | 3.83% | 4.31% |
Drawdowns
FFACX vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFACX drawdown since its inception was -53.66%, which is greater than TIBAX's maximum drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFACX and TIBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFACX | TIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.66% | -49.12% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | -8.57% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.76% | -20.94% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.23% | -34.85% | +4.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | -5.13% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -6.03% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.74% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FFACX vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) at 3.19%. This indicates that FFACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFACX | TIBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 3.19% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.45% | 6.35% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 10.70% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.91% | 11.04% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.46% | 13.43% | -1.97% |