PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFA vs. VARBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFA vs. VARBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) and Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I (VARBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFA achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly higher than VARBX's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FFA has outperformed VARBX with an annualized return of 13.56%, while VARBX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.76% annualized return.


FFA

1D
-0.78%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
3.81%
6M
6.27%
1Y
21.40%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
13.56%

VARBX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.80%
6M
1.90%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
3.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFA vs. VARBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFA
First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund
3.81%14.23%21.46%24.73%-20.26%28.69%10.82%43.35%-13.93%28.97%
VARBX
Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I
1.80%6.06%5.52%3.30%2.38%5.42%4.00%4.28%4.11%2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FFA and VARBX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2015

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFA vs. VARBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFA
FFA Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VARBX
VARBX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VARBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VARBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VARBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
VARBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VARBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFA vs. VARBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) and Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I (VARBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFAVARBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

2.31

-0.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

6.48

-4.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

30.78

-21.20

FFA vs. VARBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the VARBX Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFA and VARBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFA vs. VARBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFA drawdown since its inception was -57.51%, which is greater than VARBX's maximum drawdown of -5.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFA and VARBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFAVARBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.51%

-5.12%

-52.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-0.37%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.94%

-0.64%

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

-1.79%

-28.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.35%

-5.12%

-39.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-0.00%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-0.56%

-7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

0.13%

+2.11%

Volatility

FFA vs. VARBX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I (VARBX) at 0.26%. This indicates that FFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VARBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFAVARBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

0.26%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

0.68%

+9.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

1.10%

+11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

1.18%

+16.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

2.53%

+17.21%

FFA vs. VARBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFA has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than VARBX's 1.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFA vs. VARBX - Dividend Comparison

FFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than VARBX's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFA
First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund
8.62%6.70%6.59%6.90%7.99%5.92%6.47%6.61%8.82%6.83%7.07%7.12%
VARBX
Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I
5.93%6.04%6.29%4.07%0.75%8.42%0.81%5.54%2.15%1.70%0.06%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFA and VARBX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFA has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to VARBX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFA dropped -57.51% vs VARBX's -5.12%.

VARBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFA and VARBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer