PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFA vs. FCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFA vs. FCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) and First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II (FCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFA achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly higher than FCT's 2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FFA has outperformed FCT with an annualized return of 13.30%, while FCT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.85% annualized return.


FFA

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.45%
6M
6.38%
YTD
6.07%
1Y
17.83%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
13.30%
ALL TIME*
8.80%

FCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
6M
1.26%
YTD
2.55%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
5.85%
ALL TIME*
4.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$921.96K$1.50M$1.20M
$454.84K$474.22K$602.29K

FFA vs. FCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFA
First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund
6.07%14.23%21.46%24.73%-20.26%28.69%10.82%43.35%-13.93%28.97%
FCT
First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II
2.55%9.24%14.91%18.06%-14.54%13.72%2.73%20.13%-8.07%-1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FFA and FCT is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2004

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFA vs. FCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFA
FFA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FCT
FCT Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFA vs. FCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) and First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II (FCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFAFCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

1.16

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

3.03

+3.91

FFA vs. FCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the FCT Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFA and FCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFA vs. FCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFA drawdown since its inception was -57.51%, smaller than the maximum FCT drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFA and FCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFAFCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.51%

-67.23%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-5.04%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.94%

-11.61%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

-23.86%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.35%

-39.88%

-4.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.10%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-8.91%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.93%

+0.40%

Volatility

FFA vs. FCT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II (FCT) at 0.64%. This indicates that FFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFAFCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

0.64%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

4.14%

+5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

8.42%

+4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

11.94%

+5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

13.28%

+6.43%

FFA vs. FCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFA has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FCT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFA vs. FCT - Dividend Comparison

FFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, less than FCT's 11.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCT
First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II
10.89%11.56%11.25%10.62%9.03%9.23%9.88%6.60%6.49%6.16%6.11%7.17%
FFA
First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund
6.88%6.70%6.59%6.90%7.99%5.92%6.47%6.61%8.82%6.83%7.07%7.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFA and FCT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFA has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to FCT (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFA dropped -57.51% vs FCT's -67.23%.

FFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFA and FCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer