PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VARBX vs. QLENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VARBX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I (VARBX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VARBX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly higher than QLENX's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, VARBX has underperformed QLENX with an annualized return of 3.78%, while QLENX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.97% annualized return.


VARBX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.90%
6M
1.99%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
3.78%

QLENX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.14%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
15.19%
3Y*
25.46%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VARBX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VARBX
Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I
1.90%6.06%5.52%3.30%2.38%5.42%4.00%4.28%4.11%2.39%
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N
-0.63%34.07%30.18%23.67%18.92%30.70%-14.18%1.01%-16.64%15.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VARBX and QLENX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2015

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VARBX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VARBX
VARBX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VARBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VARBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VARBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
VARBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VARBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

QLENX
QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VARBX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I (VARBX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VARBXQLENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.25

1.39

+0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.79

2.56

+8.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

55.25

7.88

+47.38

VARBX vs. QLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VARBX Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the QLENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VARBX and QLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VARBX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VARBX drawdown since its inception was -5.12%, smaller than the maximum QLENX drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VARBX and QLENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VARBXQLENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-38.50%

+33.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.37%

-6.09%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.64%

-7.09%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.79%

-17.19%

+15.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.12%

-38.50%

+33.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.26%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-7.46%

+6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

1.97%

-1.84%

Volatility

VARBX vs. QLENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I (VARBX) is 0.26%, while AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that VARBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VARBXQLENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

2.86%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.68%

5.78%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08%

7.40%

-6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.19%

10.01%

-8.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.54%

10.60%

-8.06%

VARBX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VARBX has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is higher than QLENX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

VARBX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison

VARBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than QLENX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N
1.65%1.64%7.13%21.21%14.09%0.00%1.59%0.00%6.09%8.91%2.87%4.91%
VARBX
Vivaldi Merger Arbitrage Fund Class I
5.93%6.04%6.29%4.07%0.75%8.42%0.81%5.54%2.15%1.70%0.06%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


VARBX and QLENX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLENX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to VARBX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VARBX dropped -5.12% vs QLENX's -38.50%.

VARBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VARBX and QLENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer