FCT vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II (FCT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FCT is managed by First Trust. It was launched on Jan 1, 2013. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FCT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCT First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II | -1.43% | 9.24% | 14.91% | 18.06% | -14.54% | 13.72% | 2.73% | 20.13% | -8.07% | -1.07% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCT achieves a -1.43% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FCT has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.06%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
FCT
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- -1.43%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.06%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FCT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FCT
VOO
FCT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II (FCT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.98 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 1.50 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 1.53 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.05 | 7.29 | -4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.98 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.70 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.78 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.83 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCT and VOO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FCT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCT First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II | 12.07% | 11.56% | 11.25% | 10.62% | 9.03% | 9.23% | 9.88% | 6.60% | 6.49% | 6.16% | 6.11% | 7.17% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FCT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCT drawdown since its inception was -67.23%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCT and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.23% | -33.99% | -33.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -11.98% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.86% | -24.52% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.88% | -33.99% | -5.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -6.29% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.04% | -3.72% | -5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 2.52% | -0.34% |
Volatility
FCT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II (FCT) is 2.70%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that FCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 5.29% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.57% | 9.44% | -1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 18.10% | -5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 16.82% | -4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 17.99% | -4.64% |