FF vs. MED
FF (FutureFuel Corp.) and MED (Medifast, Inc.) are both stocks. FF operates in Chemicals (Basic Materials), while MED operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FF returned 3.98%/yr vs -7.29%/yr for MED. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FF vs. MED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FF achieves a 46.58% return, which is significantly higher than MED's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FF has outperformed MED with an annualized return of 3.98%, while MED has yielded a comparatively lower -7.29% annualized return.
FF
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 14.41%
- YTD
- 46.58%
- 6M
- 38.76%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- -6.25%
- 5Y*
- -4.53%
- 10Y*
- 3.98%
MED
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -4.73%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- -3.80%
- 1Y
- -8.40%
- 3Y*
- -46.74%
- 5Y*
- -45.89%
- 10Y*
- -7.29%
FF vs. MED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FF FutureFuel Corp. | 46.58% | -35.84% | 31.03% | -22.78% | 9.85% | -26.86% | 37.61% | -20.32% | 14.46% | 3.12% |
MED Medifast, Inc. | 11.33% | -39.39% | -73.79% | -38.34% | -42.31% | 9.36% | 86.18% | -9.73% | 82.11% | 72.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FF and MED is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2011 | 0.28 |
The correlation between FF and MED shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FF:
$202.52M
MED:
$130.86M
FF:
-$1.19
MED:
-$1.82
FF:
1.83
MED:
0.38
FF:
1.43
MED:
0.66
FF:
$110.11M
MED:
$346.10M
FF:
-$26.13M
MED:
$242.70M
FF:
-$50.17M
MED:
-$3.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FF vs. MED — Risk / Return Rank
FF
MED
FF vs. MED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FutureFuel Corp. (FF) and Medifast, Inc. (MED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FF | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.99 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | -0.26 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | -0.44 | +2.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FF vs. MED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FF drawdown since its inception was -64.23%, smaller than the maximum MED drawdown of -98.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FF and MED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FF | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.23% | -98.40% | +34.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.85% | -37.39% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.46% | -90.91% | +39.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.46% | -96.29% | +44.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.23% | -96.76% | +32.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.08% | -95.96% | +50.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.54% | -50.84% | +20.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.89% | 21.83% | -6.94% |
Volatility
FF vs. MED - Volatility Comparison
FutureFuel Corp. (FF) and Medifast, Inc. (MED) have volatilities of 9.35% and 8.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FF | MED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 8.94% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.19% | 31.69% | +7.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.93% | 41.90% | +8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.27% | 45.25% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.61% | 47.68% | -3.07% |
Dividends
FF vs. MED - Dividend Comparison
FF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while MED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FF FutureFuel Corp. | 4.13% | 7.52% | 51.80% | 3.95% | 2.95% | 35.86% | 25.51% | 1.94% | 1.51% | 1.70% | 18.20% | 1.78% |
MED Medifast, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.36% | 5.69% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 3.08% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 2.57% | 0.82% |
Financials
FF vs. MED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FutureFuel Corp. and Medifast, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FF vs. MED - Profitability Comparison
FF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FutureFuel Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 31.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.76M and revenue of 76.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
FF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FutureFuel Corp. reported an operating income of -20.84M and revenue of 31.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -65.3%.
MED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.30M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.
FF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FutureFuel Corp. reported a net income of -20.58M and revenue of 31.90M, resulting in a net margin of -64.5%.
MED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a net income of -2.12M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FF and MED have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FF has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to MED (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FF dropped -64.23% vs MED's -98.40%.
FF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FF and MED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer