FEX vs. USMV
FEX (First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FEX tracks the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Core Index while USMV tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEX returned 12.82%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for USMV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USMV.
Performance
FEX vs. USMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEX achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FEX has outperformed USMV with an annualized return of 12.82%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.48% annualized return.
FEX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 11.83%
- YTD
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
USMV
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
FEX vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEX First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 15.66% | 15.05% | 17.07% | 14.31% | -11.86% | 26.83% | 14.28% | 26.93% | -9.89% | 21.41% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.64% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 18.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEX and USMV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FEX and USMV has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FEX vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEX
USMV
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
FEX
USMV
Industrials
FEX
USMV
Financial Services
FEX
USMV
Healthcare
FEX
USMV
Consumer Cyclical
FEX
USMV
Utilities
FEX
USMV
Energy
FEX
USMV
Real Estate
FEX
USMV
Consumer Defensive
FEX
USMV
Basic Materials
FEX
USMV
Communication Services
FEX
USMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEX vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank
FEX
USMV
FEX vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEX | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.11 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 0.86 | +3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.49 | 2.80 | +10.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEX vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEX drawdown since its inception was -58.81%, which is greater than USMV's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEX and USMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEX | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.81% | -33.10% | -25.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -6.46% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.58% | -9.36% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -17.93% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.51% | -33.10% | -6.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -1.49% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -2.87% | -4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.97% | -0.19% |
Volatility
FEX vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.75%. This indicates that FEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEX | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 2.75% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 6.30% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.34% | 8.52% | +4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 12.37% | +4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 14.50% | +4.06% |
FEX vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEX vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison
FEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than USMV's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEX First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.18% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 0.80% | 1.21% | 1.32% | 1.34% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.33% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.49% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEX and USMV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to USMV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEX dropped -58.81% vs USMV's -33.10%.
On 10-year performance, FEX leads with 12.82% vs 9.48% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FEX has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FEX.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.95% for FEX.
FEX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Core Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FEX and 0.15% for USMV.
FEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEX and USMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer