PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEX vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEX vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEX achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FEX has underperformed QUS with an annualized return of 12.82%, while QUS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.


FEX

1D
1.03%
1M
0.43%
6M
11.73%
YTD
16.59%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
12.82%
ALL TIME*
9.64%

QUS

1D
0.83%
1M
1.29%
6M
7.60%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
13.54%
ALL TIME*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.97M$3.32M$3.45M
$3.01M$4.81M$3.43M

FEX vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEX
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
16.59%15.05%17.07%14.31%-11.86%26.83%14.28%26.93%-9.89%21.41%
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
10.23%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-3.66%21.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FEX and QUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015

0.84

The correlation between FEX and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEX vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEX
QUS

Technology

22.8%
28.4%

Industrials

19.0%
8.1%

Financial Services

13.9%
15.7%

Healthcare

9.1%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
5.7%

Utilities

7.0%
3.9%

Energy

5.2%
3.3%

Real Estate

4.4%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
8.3%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

3.0%
8.2%

Technology

FEX
22.8%
QUS
28.4%

Industrials

FEX
19.0%
QUS
8.1%

Financial Services

FEX
13.9%
QUS
15.7%

Healthcare

FEX
9.1%
QUS
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FEX
8.2%
QUS
5.7%

Utilities

FEX
7.0%
QUS
3.9%

Energy

FEX
5.2%
QUS
3.3%

Real Estate

FEX
4.4%
QUS
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

FEX
4.3%
QUS
8.3%

Basic Materials

FEX
3.2%
QUS
2.2%

Communication Services

FEX
3.0%
QUS
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEX vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEX
FEX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEX vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEXQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

2.90

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.07

12.95

+1.12

FEX vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEX and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEX vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEX drawdown since its inception was -58.81%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEX and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEXQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.81%

-33.78%

-25.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-6.85%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.58%

-13.94%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

-22.30%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

-33.78%

-5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

0.00%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-3.66%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.53%

+0.34%

Volatility

FEX vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.42%. This indicates that FEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEXQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

2.42%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

6.97%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

9.22%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

14.32%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

16.40%

+2.17%

FEX vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEX vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

FEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than QUS's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEX
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.94%1.10%1.18%1.38%1.61%0.80%1.21%1.32%1.34%1.07%1.29%1.33%
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.27%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEX and QUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEX has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to QUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEX dropped -58.81% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 10-year performance, QUS leads with 13.54% vs 12.82% for FEX. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QUS has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FEX.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.94% for FEX.

FEX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Core Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FEX and 0.15% for QUS.

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEX and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer