PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEX vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEX vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEX achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 32.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FEX has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 13.56%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.49% annualized return.


FEX

1D
-1.34%
1M
3.10%
YTD
16.10%
6M
14.91%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
13.56%

MTUM

1D
-4.48%
1M
8.74%
YTD
32.00%
6M
29.92%
1Y
41.78%
3Y*
33.87%
5Y*
15.18%
10Y*
17.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEX vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEX
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
16.10%15.05%17.07%14.31%-11.86%26.83%14.28%26.93%-9.89%21.41%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
32.00%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FEX and MTUM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.81

The correlation between FEX and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEX vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEX
MTUM

Technology

22.2%
50.2%

Industrials

18.8%
15.0%

Financial Services

13.6%
5.0%

Healthcare

8.8%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
2.9%

Utilities

7.0%
0.6%

Energy

5.6%
10.5%

Real Estate

4.5%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.3%

Communication Services

3.4%
5.1%

Technology

FEX
22.2%
MTUM
50.2%

Industrials

FEX
18.8%
MTUM
15.0%

Financial Services

FEX
13.6%
MTUM
5.0%

Healthcare

FEX
8.8%
MTUM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FEX
8.3%
MTUM
2.9%

Utilities

FEX
7.0%
MTUM
0.6%

Energy

FEX
5.6%
MTUM
10.5%

Real Estate

FEX
4.5%
MTUM
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

FEX
4.3%
MTUM
3.7%

Basic Materials

FEX
3.5%
MTUM
2.3%

Communication Services

FEX
3.4%
MTUM
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEX vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEX
FEX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEX vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEXMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

3.64

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.75

13.91

+2.84

FEX vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEX and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEX vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEX drawdown since its inception was -58.81%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEX and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEXMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.81%

-34.08%

-24.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-11.54%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.58%

-20.99%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

-32.28%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

-34.08%

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-4.48%

+3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-6.19%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

3.01%

-1.28%

Volatility

FEX vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) is 5.09%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that FEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEXMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

12.20%

-7.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

19.44%

-9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

21.93%

-8.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

21.15%

-4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

21.31%

-2.71%

FEX vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEX vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

FEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than MTUM's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEX
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.94%1.10%1.18%1.38%1.61%0.80%1.21%1.32%1.34%1.07%1.29%1.33%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEX and MTUM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to FEX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEX dropped -58.81% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.49% vs 13.56% for FEX. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FEX has been the lower-risk option at 5.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.49% return vs 13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FEX.

FEX has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.56% for MTUM.

FEX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. FEX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Core Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FEX and 0.15% for MTUM.

FEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEX and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer