PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEX vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEX vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FEX having a 15.12% return and FNDX slightly lower at 14.57%. Over the past 10 years, FEX has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 13.11%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.


FEX

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.13%
YTD
15.12%
6M
15.57%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
13.11%

FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEX vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEX
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
15.12%15.05%17.07%14.31%-11.86%26.83%14.28%26.93%-9.89%21.41%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.57%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FEX and FNDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.94

The correlation between FEX and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEX vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEX
FNDX

Industrials

19.4%
9.3%

Technology

18.8%
19.1%

Financial Services

14.3%
14.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
9.2%

Utilities

7.5%
3.2%

Energy

6.3%
10.3%

Real Estate

4.7%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
7.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
10.1%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.7%

Industrials

FEX
19.4%
FNDX
9.3%

Technology

FEX
18.8%
FNDX
19.1%

Financial Services

FEX
14.3%
FNDX
14.1%

Healthcare

FEX
8.9%
FNDX
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FEX
8.5%
FNDX
9.2%

Utilities

FEX
7.5%
FNDX
3.2%

Energy

FEX
6.3%
FNDX
10.3%

Real Estate

FEX
4.7%
FNDX
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

FEX
4.5%
FNDX
7.4%

Communication Services

FEX
3.6%
FNDX
10.1%

Basic Materials

FEX
3.5%
FNDX
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEX vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEX
FEX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEX vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEXFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.59

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

5.35

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.27

20.97

-3.69

FEX vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEX and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEXFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

3.18

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.85

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.82

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.79

-0.31

Drawdowns

FEX vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEX drawdown since its inception was -58.81%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEX and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEXFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.81%

-37.72%

-21.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-6.06%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.58%

-16.30%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

-19.06%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

-37.72%

-1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.13%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-3.55%

-4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.55%

+0.16%

Volatility

FEX vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FEX) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.25%. This indicates that FEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEXFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

2.25%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.17%

7.25%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

10.22%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

15.18%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

17.50%

+1.09%

FEX vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEX vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

FEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEX
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.95%1.10%1.18%1.38%1.61%0.80%1.21%1.32%1.34%1.07%1.29%1.33%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FEX and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEX dropped -58.81% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.26% vs 13.11% for FEX. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FEX.

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.95% for FEX.

FEX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. FEX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Large Cap Core Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FEX and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEX and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer