PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEUZ vs. FLGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEUZ vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUZ achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than FLGR's 0.44% return.


FEUZ

1D
-0.85%
1M
3.37%
YTD
11.32%
6M
15.72%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.35%

FLGR

1D
-1.91%
1M
3.04%
YTD
0.44%
6M
4.14%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUZ vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEUZ
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF
11.32%56.34%1.64%17.24%-19.83%11.93%5.04%22.06%-20.61%0.83%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
0.44%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUZ and FLGR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.79

The correlation between FEUZ and FLGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEUZ vs. FLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEUZ
FLGR

Industrials

27.4%
30.5%

Energy

10.8%

-

Financial Services

10.6%
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
8.2%

Utilities

8.3%
5.0%

Basic Materials

7.5%
5.9%

Technology

6.1%
13.9%

Real Estate

6.0%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
1.4%

Healthcare

5.2%
5.8%

Communication Services

3.7%
6.3%

Industrials

FEUZ
27.4%
FLGR
30.5%

Energy

FEUZ
10.8%
FLGR

-

Financial Services

FEUZ
10.6%
FLGR
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FEUZ
9.2%
FLGR
8.2%

Utilities

FEUZ
8.3%
FLGR
5.0%

Basic Materials

FEUZ
7.5%
FLGR
5.9%

Technology

FEUZ
6.1%
FLGR
13.9%

Real Estate

FEUZ
6.0%
FLGR
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

FEUZ
5.3%
FLGR
1.4%

Healthcare

FEUZ
5.2%
FLGR
5.8%

Communication Services

FEUZ
3.7%
FLGR
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEUZ vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUZ
FEUZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FEUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUZ vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEUZFLGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.05

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

0.22

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

0.63

+8.78

FEUZ vs. FLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the FLGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUZ and FLGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEUZFLGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.19

+1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.32

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.28

+0.16

Drawdowns

FEUZ vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUZ drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, roughly equal to the maximum FLGR drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUZ and FLGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEUZFLGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-46.21%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-14.44%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-15.53%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.64%

-43.54%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-4.26%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.49%

-12.37%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

5.03%

-1.74%

Volatility

FEUZ vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) at 6.23%. This indicates that FEUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEUZFLGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

6.23%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.34%

14.03%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.31%

17.18%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

20.26%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

21.43%

+0.35%

FEUZ vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGR's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEUZ vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison

FEUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than FLGR's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEUZ
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF
2.37%2.81%2.01%2.95%3.14%2.52%1.46%1.93%2.46%1.29%2.12%1.09%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.71%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEUZ and FLGR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEUZ has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to FLGR (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEUZ dropped -48.08% vs FLGR's -46.21%.

On 5-year performance, FEUZ leads with 9.94% vs 6.45% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLGR has been the lower-risk option at 6.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FEUZ has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEUZ.

FEUZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.71% for FLGR.

FEUZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Eurozone Index, while FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEUZ and 0.09% for FLGR.

FEUZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUZ and FLGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer