PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FEUZ.L (First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares) and HMCX.L (HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP) are both Europe Equities funds - FEUZ.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while HMCX.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEUZ.L returned 11.52%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for HMCX.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEUZ.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HMCX.L.

Performance

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L) and HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUZ.L achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly higher than HMCX.L's 4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FEUZ.L has outperformed HMCX.L with an annualized return of 11.52%, while HMCX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.70% annualized return.

FEUZ.L

1D
0.40%
1M
3.03%
YTD
12.51%
6M
15.50%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
11.52%

HMCX.L

1D
0.46%
1M
4.18%
YTD
4.02%
6M
5.81%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEUZ.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares		12.51%48.45%3.89%9.28%-9.28%13.80%1.55%16.96%-15.00%24.03%
HMCX.L
HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP		4.02%8.36%3.93%4.54%-19.69%13.90%-7.19%25.24%-15.88%14.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUZ.L and HMCX.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014

0.51

The correlation between FEUZ.L and HMCX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FEUZ.L
HMCX.L

Industrials

27.4%
19.9%

Energy

10.8%
2.5%

Financial Services

10.6%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
13.4%

Utilities

8.3%
3.0%

Basic Materials

7.5%
6.7%

Real Estate

6.0%
9.5%

Technology

6.0%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
6.2%

Healthcare

5.2%
4.4%

Communication Services

3.7%
5.9%

Industrials

FEUZ.L
27.4%
HMCX.L
19.9%

Energy

FEUZ.L
10.8%
HMCX.L
2.5%

Financial Services

FEUZ.L
10.6%
HMCX.L
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FEUZ.L
9.2%
HMCX.L
13.4%

Utilities

FEUZ.L
8.3%
HMCX.L
3.0%

Basic Materials

FEUZ.L
7.5%
HMCX.L
6.7%

Real Estate

FEUZ.L
6.0%
HMCX.L
9.5%

Technology

FEUZ.L
6.0%
HMCX.L
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

FEUZ.L
5.3%
HMCX.L
6.2%

Healthcare

FEUZ.L
5.2%
HMCX.L
4.4%

Communication Services

FEUZ.L
3.7%
HMCX.L
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares

HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP

Often compared with FEUZ.L:
FEUZ.L vs. VEUR.LFEUZ.L vs. ILFFEUZ.L vs. PRUK.LFEUZ.L vs. EEUD.LFEUZ.L vs. EDIV.LFEUZ.L vs. CSWG.LFEUZ.L vs. CAPS.L
Often compared with HMCX.L:
HMCX.L vs. XLKHMCX.L vs. QQQHMCX.L vs. ^GSPCHMCX.L vs. UBSHMCX.L vs. HUKX.LHMCX.L vs. SPMOHMCX.L vs. SWPPX

Return for Risk

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FEUZ.L
FEUZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FEUZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
HMCX.L
HMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L) and HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FEUZ.LHMCX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.34
0.75

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.12
1.18

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.14

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

0.80

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.55

2.76

+9.79

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the HMCX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUZ.L and HMCX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FEUZ.LHMCX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

0.75

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.00

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.17

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.30

+0.49

Drawdowns

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUZ.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, smaller than the maximum HMCX.L drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUZ.L and HMCX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FEUZ.LHMCX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.68%

-41.87%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-12.19%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.10%

-17.36%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.27%

-31.75%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.68%

-41.87%

+5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-5.53%

+5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-9.50%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

3.56%

-0.85%

Volatility

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L) is 3.86%, while HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (HMCX.L) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that FEUZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMCX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FEUZ.LHMCX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

4.57%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

11.16%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

13.15%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

15.08%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

16.17%

+2.78%

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUZ.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HMCX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEUZ.L vs. HMCX.L - Dividend Comparison

FEUZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEUZ.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMCX.L
HSBC FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP		0.04%0.04%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

FEUZ.L and HMCX.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMCX.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMCX.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEUZ.L.

FEUZ.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while HMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEUZ.L and 0.35% for HMCX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUZ.L and HMCX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer