FEUS vs. BUFH
FEUS (FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEUS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
FEUS vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEUS achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.30% return.
FEUS
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 22.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEUS vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FEUS FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund | 7.39% | 12.69% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.30% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEUS and BUFH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEUS vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
FEUS
BUFH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FEUS vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund (FEUS) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEUS | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEUS vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEUS drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUS and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEUS | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.31% | -1.53% | -23.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -0.26% | -3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -0.18% | -6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility
FEUS vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEUS | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 2.38% | +10.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 2.38% | +14.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 2.38% | +14.65% |
FEUS vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEUS vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
FEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEUS FlexShares ESG & Climate US Large Cap Core Index Fund | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEUS and BUFH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
FEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
FEUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FEUS and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for FEUS and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer