FEUR.L vs. LCPE.L
FEUR.L (Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, from Fidelity and Natixis respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEUR.L returned 8.56%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEUR.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
FEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEUR.L is traded in GBP, while LCPE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LCPE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEUR.L achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return.
FEUR.L
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- —
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
FEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUR.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 5.75% | 22.87% | 2.49% | 11.56% | -4.77% | 17.59% | 9.82% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 15.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEUR.L and LCPE.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.39 |
The correlation between FEUR.L and LCPE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
-
Industrials
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
Technology
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
Basic Materials
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
Communication Services
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
Energy
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
-
Real Estate
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEUR.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEUR.L
LCPE.L
FEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FEUR.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEUR.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.43 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 4.13 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 13.66 | -9.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEUR.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.44 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.04 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.98 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
FEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEUR.L drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum LCPE.L drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUR.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEUR.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -27.05% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -6.66% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.97% | -12.39% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.72% | -12.39% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -2.71% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -3.52% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 2.02% | +1.21% |
Volatility
FEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FEUR.L) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that FEUR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEUR.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 3.81% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.19% | 8.48% | +3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.61% | 11.29% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 17.74% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 20.60% | -5.86% |
FEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEUR.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEUR.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEUR.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FEUR.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEUR.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FEUR.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for FEUR.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer