PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEUR.L vs. FUSS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEUR.L vs. FUSS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FEUR.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUR.L achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than FUSS.L's 9.95% return.


FEUR.L

1D
-0.90%
1M
1.70%
YTD
4.32%
6M
6.70%
1Y
14.11%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*

FUSS.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.95%
YTD
9.95%
6M
9.69%
1Y
29.83%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUR.L vs. FUSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FEUR.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc
4.32%22.87%2.49%11.56%-4.77%17.59%9.82%
FUSS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc
9.95%9.84%28.34%22.30%-11.83%28.45%13.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUR.L and FUSS.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.61

The correlation between FEUR.L and FUSS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEUR.L vs. FUSS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUR.L
FEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FUSS.L
FUSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FUSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUR.L vs. FUSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FEUR.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEUR.LFUSS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

2.58

-1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

3.48

-2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.46

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.60

-2.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.36

12.81

-8.45

FEUR.L vs. FUSS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the FUSS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUR.L and FUSS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEUR.LFUSS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.58

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

1.00

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.06

-0.35

Drawdowns

FEUR.L vs. FUSS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUR.L drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum FUSS.L drawdown of -22.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUR.L and FUSS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEUR.LFUSS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.72%

-22.18%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-8.24%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.97%

-22.18%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.72%

-22.18%

+5.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.43%

-0.23%

-3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-3.62%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

2.32%

+0.91%

Volatility

FEUR.L vs. FUSS.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FEUR.L) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that FEUR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEUR.LFUSS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

2.62%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

7.70%

+4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

11.57%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

14.83%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.74%

15.18%

-0.44%

FEUR.L vs. FUSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FEUR.L and FUSS.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

FEUR.L vs. FUSS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEUR.L nor FUSS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FEUR.L and FUSS.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEUR.L and FUSS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

FEUR.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while FUSS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. FEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FUSS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUR.L and FUSS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer