FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L
FEUR.L (Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc) and FGQD.L (Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEUR.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FGQD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Global Quality Income index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEUR.L returned 8.27%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for FGQD.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEUR.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FGQD.L.
Performance
FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEUR.L is traded in GBP, while FGQD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGQD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEUR.L achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than FGQD.L's 10.09% return.
FEUR.L
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
FGQD.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 9.92%
- 1Y
- 26.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.87%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- —
FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUR.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 4.32% | 22.87% | 2.49% | 11.56% | -4.77% | 17.59% | 9.82% |
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF | 10.09% | 11.78% | 13.21% | 11.51% | -0.25% | 23.78% | 9.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEUR.L and FGQD.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FEUR.L and FGQD.L has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Industrials
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Healthcare
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Technology
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Consumer Defensive
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Consumer Cyclical
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Basic Materials
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Communication Services
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Energy
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Utilities
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Real Estate
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEUR.L
FGQD.L
FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FEUR.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEUR.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 3.02 | -2.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 4.09 | -2.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.58 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 3.87 | -2.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 16.85 | -12.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEUR.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 3.02 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.98 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.86 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEUR.L drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum FGQD.L drawdown of -26.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUR.L and FGQD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEUR.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -26.43% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -6.93% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.97% | -16.90% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.72% | -16.90% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.43% | -0.09% | -3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -2.90% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 1.59% | +1.64% |
Volatility
FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FEUR.L) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) at 1.91%. This indicates that FEUR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEUR.L | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 1.91% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 6.38% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 8.93% | +5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 12.07% | +2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 14.62% | +0.12% |
FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEUR.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FGQD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Dividend Comparison
FEUR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEUR.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF | 1.82% | 1.87% | 2.31% | 2.78% | 2.69% | 2.46% | 2.60% | 2.44% | 2.70% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEUR.L and FGQD.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEUR.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.
FEUR.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while FGQD.L is Global Equities. FEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FEUR.L and 0.40% for FGQD.L.
Find the right allocation for FEUR.L and FGQD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer