PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FEUR.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FEUR.L is traded in GBP, while FGQD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGQD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUR.L achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than FGQD.L's 10.09% return.


FEUR.L

1D
-0.90%
1M
1.70%
YTD
4.32%
6M
6.70%
1Y
14.11%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*

FGQD.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.19%
YTD
10.09%
6M
9.92%
1Y
26.95%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FEUR.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc
4.32%22.87%2.49%11.56%-4.77%17.59%9.82%
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
10.09%11.78%13.21%11.51%-0.25%23.78%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUR.L and FGQD.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FEUR.L and FGQD.L has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEUR.L
FGQD.L

Financial Services

24.5%
15.9%

Industrials

19.7%
11.7%

Healthcare

13.3%
8.8%

Technology

9.4%
30.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
8.6%

Basic Materials

4.9%
3.0%

Communication Services

4.7%
8.4%

Energy

4.1%
3.9%

Utilities

3.2%
2.5%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.9%

Financial Services

FEUR.L
24.5%
FGQD.L
15.9%

Industrials

FEUR.L
19.7%
FGQD.L
11.7%

Healthcare

FEUR.L
13.3%
FGQD.L
8.8%

Technology

FEUR.L
9.4%
FGQD.L
30.7%

Consumer Defensive

FEUR.L
8.3%
FGQD.L
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FEUR.L
7.3%
FGQD.L
8.6%

Basic Materials

FEUR.L
4.9%
FGQD.L
3.0%

Communication Services

FEUR.L
4.7%
FGQD.L
8.4%

Energy

FEUR.L
4.1%
FGQD.L
3.9%

Utilities

FEUR.L
3.2%
FGQD.L
2.5%

Real Estate

FEUR.L
0.7%
FGQD.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUR.L
FEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FGQD.L
FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FEUR.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEUR.LFGQD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

3.02

-2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

4.09

-2.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.58

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.87

-2.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.36

16.85

-12.50

FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUR.L and FGQD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEUR.LFGQD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

3.02

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.98

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.86

-0.16

Drawdowns

FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUR.L drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum FGQD.L drawdown of -26.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUR.L and FGQD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEUR.LFGQD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.72%

-26.43%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-6.93%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.97%

-16.90%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.72%

-16.90%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.43%

-0.09%

-3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-2.90%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

1.59%

+1.64%

Volatility

FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FEUR.L) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) at 1.91%. This indicates that FEUR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEUR.LFGQD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

1.91%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

6.38%

+5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

8.93%

+5.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

12.07%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.74%

14.62%

+0.12%

FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUR.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FGQD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEUR.L vs. FGQD.L - Dividend Comparison

FEUR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEUR.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Europe Equity UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
1.82%1.87%2.31%2.78%2.69%2.46%2.60%2.44%2.70%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEUR.L and FGQD.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEUR.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.

FEUR.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while FGQD.L is Global Equities. FEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FEUR.L and 0.40% for FGQD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUR.L and FGQD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer