PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEUCX vs. MFWIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEUCX vs. MFWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FEUCX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUCX achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly higher than MFWIX's 5.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FEUCX has outperformed MFWIX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while MFWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.55% annualized return.


FEUCX

1D
0.04%
1M
3.58%
YTD
12.93%
6M
13.86%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
12.80%

MFWIX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.13%
YTD
5.46%
6M
6.88%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*
6.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUCX vs. MFWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEUCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class C
12.93%16.91%40.54%27.46%-25.23%17.94%23.45%21.86%-18.86%29.38%
MFWIX
MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I
5.46%15.70%4.25%10.52%-10.62%8.59%9.63%18.49%-6.96%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUCX and MFWIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1998

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between FEUCX and MFWIX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEUCX vs. MFWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUCX
FEUCX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FEUCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MFWIX
MFWIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MFWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MFWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUCX vs. MFWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FEUCX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEUCXMFWIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.11

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

7.49

+1.59

FEUCX vs. MFWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the MFWIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUCX and MFWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEUCXMFWIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.91

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.54

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.68

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.72

-0.32

Drawdowns

FEUCX vs. MFWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUCX drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, which is greater than MFWIX's maximum drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUCX and MFWIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEUCXMFWIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.20%

-33.01%

-27.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-6.73%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-8.63%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-20.22%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.13%

-23.36%

-10.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.94%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-3.82%

-9.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

1.89%

+1.35%

Volatility

FEUCX vs. MFWIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class C (FEUCX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) at 2.13%. This indicates that FEUCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEUCXMFWIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

2.13%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

5.70%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

7.41%

+9.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

9.14%

+10.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.67%

9.63%

+9.04%

FEUCX vs. MFWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUCX has a 1.92% expense ratio, which is higher than MFWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEUCX vs. MFWIX - Dividend Comparison

FEUCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, more than MFWIX's 8.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEUCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class C
11.57%13.07%19.24%7.72%0.00%9.86%0.00%0.00%12.40%15.33%1.17%0.64%
MFWIX
MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I
8.31%8.77%9.36%3.98%2.94%10.71%7.53%4.70%3.64%2.36%1.40%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEUCX and MFWIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEUCX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to MFWIX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEUCX dropped -60.20% vs MFWIX's -33.01%.

MFWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUCX and MFWIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer