PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FETH vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FETH vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -46.74% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.46% return.


FETH

1D
-4.71%
1M
-23.26%
YTD
-46.74%
6M
-46.16%
1Y
-35.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.01%
1M
37.47%
YTD
10.46%
6M
14.06%
1Y
97.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FETH vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-46.74%48.35%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
10.46%52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FETH and WNTR is -0.74, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.72

The correlation between FETH and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FETH vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FETH vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FETHWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.30

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

2.29

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.87

5.85

-6.71

FETH vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FETH and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FETH vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FETHWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.57%

-42.65%

-24.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.57%

-42.65%

-24.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.42%

-9.88%

-57.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-20.93%

-12.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.71%

16.70%

+24.01%

Volatility

FETH vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a higher volatility of 19.96% compared to YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 17.54%. This indicates that FETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FETHWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.96%

17.54%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.42%

45.99%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.19%

52.83%

+16.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.39%

53.10%

+19.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.39%

53.10%

+19.29%

FETH vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FETH vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.66%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FETH and WNTR have a correlation of -0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (19.96%) compared to WNTR (17.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETH dropped -67.57% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs -35.26% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 17.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs -35.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FETH and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FETH and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer