FETH vs. IBLC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - FETH tracks the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index while IBLC tracks the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FETH returned -31.75% vs 73.27% for IBLC. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FETH charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.

Performance

FETH vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.34% return.

FETH

• 1D: -5.78%
• 1M: -23.67%
• YTD: -39.45%
• 6M: -42.77%
• 1Y: -31.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBLC

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 13.52%
• YTD: 32.34%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 73.27%
• 3Y*: 48.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FETH vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	-39.45%	-11.37%	-3.61%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	32.34%	27.05%	-3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FETH and IBLC is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024	0.68

The correlation between FETH and IBLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FETH vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FETH

FETH Risk / Return Rank: 5
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

IBLC

IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 33
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FETH vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FETH	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	1.34	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	1.92	-2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.23	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	1.64	-2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	3.26	-4.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FETH vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the IBLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FETH and IBLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FETH	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	1.34	-1.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.41	0.40	-0.81

Drawdowns

FETH vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -64.00%, roughly equal to the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and IBLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FETH	IBLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.00%	-62.54%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.95%	-44.94%	-18.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-51.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.95%	-12.99%	-49.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.73%	-25.89%	-6.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.82%	22.56%	+15.26%

Volatility

FETH vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) is 9.99%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that FETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FETH	IBLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.99%	14.67%	-4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.01%	40.76%	+5.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.50%	54.94%	+13.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.27%	64.49%	+7.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.27%	64.49%	+7.78%

FETH vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FETH has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

FETH vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	4.77%	6.31%	1.60%	1.79%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FETH and IBLC in my portfolio?

FETH and IBLC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FETH or IBLC?

IBLC has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to FETH (9.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETH dropped -64.00% vs IBLC's -62.54%.

Which ETF is better, FETH or IBLC?

On 1-year performance, IBLC leads with 73.27% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FETH or IBLC?

Over the 1-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 73.27% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FETH or IBLC?

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FETH or IBLC?

IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

What is the main difference between FETH and IBLC?

FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for FETH and 0.47% for IBLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.