FETH vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FETH returned -34.36% vs 22.58% for GLDM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

FETH vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -44.01% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -2.40% return.

FETH

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -25.08%
• YTD: -44.01%
• 6M: -46.08%
• 1Y: -34.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -7.40%
• YTD: -2.40%
• 6M: -2.09%
• 1Y: 22.58%
• 3Y*: 29.27%
• 5Y*: 17.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FETH vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	-44.01%	-11.37%	-4.68%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-2.40%	64.20%	9.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FETH and GLDM is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.12

Return for Risk

FETH vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FETH

FETH Risk / Return Rank: 5
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 27
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FETH vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FETH	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	0.90	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	1.26	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.19	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	1.00	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	2.87	-3.85

FETH vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FETH and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FETH vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FETH	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.57%	-24.35%	-43.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.57%	-24.35%	-43.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.74%	-21.96%	-43.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.30%	-6.27%	-27.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.31%	8.44%	+30.87%

Volatility

FETH vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a higher volatility of 17.03% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 7.73%. This indicates that FETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FETH	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.03%	7.73%	+9.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.32%	23.93%	+22.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.12%	27.15%	+41.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.38%	18.13%	+54.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.38%	16.98%	+55.40%

FETH vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FETH vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither FETH nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FETH and GLDM in my portfolio?

FETH and GLDM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FETH or GLDM?

FETH has higher volatility (17.03%) compared to GLDM (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETH dropped -67.57% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

Which ETF is better, FETH or GLDM?

On 1-year performance, GLDM leads with 22.58% vs -34.36% for FETH. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 7.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FETH or GLDM?

Over the 1-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 22.58% return vs -34.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FETH or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FETH or GLDM?

FETH and GLDM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FETH and GLDM?

FETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GLDM is Gold. FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FETH and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.