FETH vs. BFOC
FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. FETH is passively managed, while BFOC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FETH charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
FETH vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FETH achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.39% return.
FETH
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.77%
- 1Y
- -31.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -39.45% | -31.63% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.39% | -9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FETH and BFOC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FETH vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
FETH
BFOC
FETH vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FETH | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FETH | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | -1.88 | +1.46 |
Drawdowns
FETH vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -64.00%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FETH | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.00% | -18.20% | -45.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.95% | -18.20% | -44.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -12.52% | -20.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.82% | — | — |
Volatility
FETH vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FETH | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.50% | 12.61% | +55.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.27% | 12.61% | +59.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.27% | 12.61% | +59.66% |
FETH vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FETH has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
FETH vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
Neither FETH nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FETH and BFOC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
FETH and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for FETH and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for FETH and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer