FESM vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
FESM and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FESM is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017.
Performance
FESM vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FESM vs. OMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 1.59% | 17.88% | 16.22% | 12.19% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | -0.49% | 13.68% | 6.82% | 8.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FESM achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than OMFL's -0.49% return.
FESM
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMFL
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 14.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FESM vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FESM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FESM vs. OMFL — Risk / Return Rank
FESM
OMFL
FESM vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FESM | OMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.86 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 1.33 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 1.48 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 6.95 | +1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FESM | OMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.86 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.63 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FESM and OMFL is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FESM vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
FESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than OMFL's 0.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 0.85% | 0.80% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
FESM vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FESM drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, smaller than the maximum OMFL drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESM and OMFL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FESM | OMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.93% | -33.24% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -10.00% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.52% | -4.31% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -4.89% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 2.13% | +1.42% |
Volatility
FESM vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 5.22%. This indicates that FESM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FESM | OMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 5.22% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.27% | 10.06% | +4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.99% | 16.71% | +6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 16.81% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 20.25% | +1.23% |