PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FESM vs. FMDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FESM vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FESM achieves a 21.71% return, which is significantly higher than FMDE's 9.48% return.


FESM

1D
2.99%
1M
3.87%
YTD
21.71%
6M
17.35%
1Y
46.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMDE

1D
2.21%
1M
2.61%
YTD
9.48%
6M
7.90%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FESM vs. FMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
21.71%17.88%16.22%12.09%
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
9.48%12.19%21.76%9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FESM and FMDE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023

0.89

The correlation between FESM and FMDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FESM vs. FMDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FESM
FMDE

Technology

21.6%
20.6%

Industrials

19.1%
20.1%

Healthcare

15.7%
7.8%

Financial Services

14.8%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
12.1%

Energy

7.2%
6.4%

Real Estate

4.2%
5.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.9%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.8%

Utilities

2.0%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
1.7%

Technology

FESM
21.6%
FMDE
20.6%

Industrials

FESM
19.1%
FMDE
20.1%

Healthcare

FESM
15.7%
FMDE
7.8%

Financial Services

FESM
14.8%
FMDE
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FESM
7.4%
FMDE
12.1%

Energy

FESM
7.2%
FMDE
6.4%

Real Estate

FESM
4.2%
FMDE
5.7%

Basic Materials

FESM
3.5%
FMDE
3.9%

Communication Services

FESM
3.1%
FMDE
3.8%

Utilities

FESM
2.0%
FMDE
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

FESM
1.4%
FMDE
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FESM vs. FMDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FESM
FESM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FESM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FESM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FMDE
FMDE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FMDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FESM vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FESMFMDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.25

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

2.35

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.65

9.21

+7.44

FESM vs. FMDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FESM Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the FMDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FESM and FMDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FESM vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FESM drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, which is greater than FMDE's maximum drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESM and FMDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FESMFMDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.93%

-21.10%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.18%

-8.33%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.05%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-2.63%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.12%

+0.71%

Volatility

FESM vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) at 4.45%. This indicates that FESM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FESMFMDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

4.45%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.08%

10.38%

+3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

13.99%

+5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.36%

16.19%

+5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.36%

16.19%

+5.17%

FESM vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FESM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

FESM vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison

FESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than FMDE's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
0.53%0.82%1.08%0.06%
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
1.11%1.23%1.11%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FESM and FMDE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FESM has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to FMDE (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FESM dropped -26.93% vs FMDE's -21.10%.

On 1-year performance, FESM leads with 46.94% vs 19.49% for FMDE. On fees, FMDE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, FMDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FESM has performed better with a 46.94% return vs 19.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMDE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for FESM.

FMDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.53% for FESM.

FESM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FMDE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FESM and 0.23% for FMDE.

FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FESM and FMDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer