FEQHX vs. MBXIX
FEQHX (Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund) and MBXIX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - FEQHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while MBXIX is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 3 years, FEQHX returned 17.81%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for MBXIX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEQHX charges 0.55%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for MBXIX.
Performance
FEQHX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEQHX achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 13.48% return.
FEQHX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBXIX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 13.48%
- 6M
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 21.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
FEQHX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEQHX Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund | 10.01% | 13.61% | 19.46% | 17.65% | -4.85% |
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 13.48% | 4.35% | 13.49% | -0.67% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEQHX and MBXIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEQHX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank
FEQHX
MBXIX
FEQHX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEQHX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.56 | 3.12 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.60 | 4.60 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.61 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 5.54 | -2.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.53 | 21.51 | -8.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEQHX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 3.12 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.69 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
FEQHX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEQHX drawdown since its inception was -10.42%, smaller than the maximum MBXIX drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQHX and MBXIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEQHX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.42% | -31.73% | +21.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.40% | -3.85% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.42% | -15.59% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.67% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -4.00% | +1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 0.99% | +0.86% |
Volatility
FEQHX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.88%. This indicates that FEQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEQHX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 1.88% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.64% | 5.21% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.16% | 7.05% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.24% | 11.55% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.24% | 13.42% | -2.18% |
FEQHX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEQHX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEQHX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison
FEQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEQHX Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund | 0.51% | 0.43% | 0.61% | 0.77% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.63% | 2.25% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 4.27% | 5.18% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 1.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEQHX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEQHX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to MBXIX (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEQHX dropped -10.42% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.
MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEQHX and MBXIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer