PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEQHX vs. GTLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEQHX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEQHX achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than GTLOX's 22.30% return.


FEQHX

1D
-0.67%
1M
3.76%
YTD
9.27%
6M
8.72%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
10Y*

GTLOX

1D
-0.12%
1M
7.64%
YTD
22.30%
6M
24.43%
1Y
41.73%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
12.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEQHX vs. GTLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
9.27%13.61%19.46%17.65%-4.85%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
22.30%14.39%13.86%16.66%-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FEQHX and GTLOX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022

0.85

The correlation between FEQHX and GTLOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEQHX vs. GTLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQHX
FEQHX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FEQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLOX
GTLOX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GTLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQHX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEQHXGTLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.53

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

5.68

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

24.44

-12.82

FEQHX vs. GTLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQHX and GTLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEQHXGTLOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

3.06

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.50

+0.80

Drawdowns

FEQHX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQHX drawdown since its inception was -10.42%, smaller than the maximum GTLOX drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQHX and GTLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEQHXGTLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.42%

-54.09%

+43.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-7.47%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.42%

-32.85%

+22.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.12%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.22%

-8.33%

+6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.73%

+0.12%

Volatility

FEQHX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) is 2.76%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that FEQHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEQHXGTLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

4.27%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

10.35%

-3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.18%

13.88%

-4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.24%

21.86%

-10.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.24%

20.91%

-9.67%

FEQHX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQHX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEQHX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

FEQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than GTLOX's 14.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
0.51%0.43%0.61%0.77%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
14.64%17.84%25.96%8.32%23.58%13.35%9.06%5.35%10.53%4.99%1.08%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEQHX and GTLOX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTLOX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to FEQHX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEQHX dropped -10.42% vs GTLOX's -54.09%.

GTLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEQHX and GTLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer