PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEPIX vs. CZMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEPIX vs. CZMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FEPIX) and Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEPIX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than CZMVX's 9.62% return.


FEPIX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.48%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
2.35%

CZMVX

1D
0.42%
1M
2.09%
YTD
9.62%
6M
10.53%
1Y
20.49%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEPIX vs. CZMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEPIX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
0.55%7.45%1.71%6.79%-13.55%-0.46%9.29%9.83%-0.82%3.79%
CZMVX
Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund
9.62%12.82%12.90%11.85%-7.94%25.55%5.88%28.61%-9.10%17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FEPIX and CZMVX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.01

Over the past year, FEPIX and CZMVX have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEPIX vs. CZMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEPIX
FEPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FEPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FEPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CZMVX
CZMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CZMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CZMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEPIX vs. CZMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FEPIX) and Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEPIXCZMVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

2.14

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

3.08

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.46

-1.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.87

13.32

-7.45

FEPIX vs. CZMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the CZMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEPIX and CZMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEPIXCZMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.14

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.60

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.62

+0.28

Drawdowns

FEPIX vs. CZMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEPIX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum CZMVX drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEPIX and CZMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEPIXCZMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-37.43%

+19.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-6.23%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.85%

-15.18%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

-19.85%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

0.00%

-1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-4.56%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.62%

-0.65%

Volatility

FEPIX vs. CZMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FEPIX) is 1.35%, while Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that FEPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CZMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEPIXCZMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.20%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

7.28%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

10.09%

-6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.67%

14.81%

-9.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

17.68%

-12.95%

FEPIX vs. CZMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEPIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CZMVX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEPIX vs. CZMVX - Dividend Comparison

FEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than CZMVX's 14.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CZMVX
Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund
14.08%15.46%9.03%6.53%11.79%8.01%2.45%3.62%8.47%4.76%0.00%0.00%
FEPIX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
4.30%4.31%3.74%3.74%2.49%1.87%5.17%2.97%3.14%2.92%3.55%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEPIX and CZMVX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CZMVX has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to FEPIX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEPIX dropped -18.40% vs CZMVX's -37.43%.

CZMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEPIX and CZMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer