FEPI vs. WTIU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - FEPI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by REX, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). FEPI is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. Over the past year, FEPI returned 33.15% vs 103.25% for WTIU. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEPI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.

Performance

FEPI vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEPI achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 91.57% return.

FEPI

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 6M: 11.37%
• 1Y: 33.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WTIU

• 1D: 4.02%
• 1M: -7.74%
• YTD: 91.57%
• 6M: 66.33%
• 1Y: 103.25%
• 3Y*: 5.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEPI vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	10.42%	18.33%	15.69%	11.70%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	91.57%	-17.13%	-29.63%	-14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FEPI and WTIU is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023	0.03

The correlation between FEPI and WTIU shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEPI vs. WTIU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEPI	WTIU
Technology	62.1%	-
Communication Services	24.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FEPI vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEPI

FEPI Risk / Return Rank: 54
FEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 43
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 37
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEPI vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEPI	WTIU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.54	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.00	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.25	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	2.65	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.66	6.55	+2.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEPI vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEPI and WTIU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEPI	WTIU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.54	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	-0.09	+1.25

Drawdowns

FEPI vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEPI drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEPI and WTIU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEPI	WTIU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.56%	-75.73%	+52.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.91%	-39.11%	+26.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-75.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-32.10%	+30.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-39.19%	+35.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	15.83%	-11.99%

Volatility

FEPI vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) is 3.31%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 27.06%. This indicates that FEPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEPI	WTIU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	27.06%	-23.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.58%	54.98%	-42.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.54%	67.51%	-50.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.02%	70.62%	-51.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.02%	70.62%	-51.60%

FEPI vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEPI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEPI vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

FEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.92%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF	23.92%	25.48%	27.18%	4.21%
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEPI and WTIU in my portfolio?

FEPI and WTIU have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEPI or WTIU?

WTIU has higher volatility (27.06%) compared to FEPI (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEPI dropped -23.56% vs WTIU's -75.73%.

Which ETF is better, FEPI or WTIU?

On 1-year performance, WTIU leads with 103.25% vs 33.15% for FEPI. On fees, FEPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FEPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEPI or WTIU?

Over the 1-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 103.25% return vs 33.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEPI or WTIU?

FEPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEPI or WTIU?

FEPI has the higher dividend yield at 23.92%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

What is the main difference between FEPI and WTIU?

FEPI is categorized as Technology Equities, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FEPI and 0.95% for WTIU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.