FEPI vs. MAGY
FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) and MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEPI returned 29.40% vs 9.58% for MAGY. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEPI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MAGY.
Performance
FEPI vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEPI achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly higher than MAGY's -3.76% return.
FEPI
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- -3.76%
- 6M
- -2.38%
- 1Y
- 9.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEPI vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.42% | 40.46% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | -3.76% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEPI and MAGY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FEPI and MAGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEPI vs. MAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEPI
MAGY
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FEPI
MAGY
-
Communication Services
FEPI
MAGY
-
Consumer Cyclical
FEPI
MAGY
-
Basic Materials
FEPI
-
MAGY
-
Consumer Defensive
FEPI
-
MAGY
-
Energy
FEPI
-
MAGY
-
Financial Services
FEPI
-
MAGY
Healthcare
FEPI
-
MAGY
-
Industrials
FEPI
-
MAGY
-
Real Estate
FEPI
-
MAGY
-
Utilities
FEPI
-
MAGY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEPI vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank
FEPI
MAGY
FEPI vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEPI | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.13 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 0.67 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.48 | 2.15 | +5.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEPI vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEPI drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEPI and MAGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEPI | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.56% | -14.29% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.91% | -14.29% | +1.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -5.86% | +2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -2.79% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 4.46% | -0.52% |
Volatility
FEPI vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) have volatilities of 6.42% and 6.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEPI | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 6.19% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.68% | 12.46% | +1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 15.04% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 15.21% | +3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 15.21% | +3.98% |
FEPI vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEPI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEPI vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison
FEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.96%, less than MAGY's 38.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 24.96% | 25.48% | 27.18% | 4.21% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 38.39% | 23.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEPI and MAGY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEPI has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to MAGY (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEPI dropped -23.56% vs MAGY's -14.29%.
On 1-year performance, FEPI leads with 29.40% vs 9.58% for MAGY. On fees, FEPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEPI has performed better with a 29.40% return vs 9.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.
MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 38.39%, compared with 24.96% for FEPI.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FEPI and 0.99% for MAGY.
FEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEPI and MAGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer