PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEP vs. EZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEP vs. EZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEP achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly higher than EZU's 6.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEP having a 10.27% annualized return and EZU not far behind at 9.83%.


FEP

1D
-0.92%
1M
3.14%
YTD
9.99%
6M
15.27%
1Y
30.19%
3Y*
24.76%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
10.27%

EZU

1D
-1.14%
1M
5.27%
YTD
6.94%
6M
9.19%
1Y
19.47%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEP vs. EZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
9.99%55.72%3.38%16.85%-22.97%17.03%4.12%24.83%-19.00%36.27%
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
6.94%40.00%2.23%23.44%-17.25%13.92%7.62%23.27%-16.76%27.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FEP and EZU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2011

0.85

The correlation between FEP and EZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEP vs. EZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEP
EZU

Industrials

25.4%
21.3%

Basic Materials

11.3%
4.1%

Energy

11.0%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
8.3%

Financial Services

9.8%
24.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
5.6%

Utilities

7.1%
6.8%

Real Estate

5.2%
1.0%

Healthcare

4.8%
5.8%

Communication Services

3.7%
4.1%

Technology

3.0%
14.6%

Industrials

FEP
25.4%
EZU
21.3%

Basic Materials

FEP
11.3%
EZU
4.1%

Energy

FEP
11.0%
EZU
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FEP
10.7%
EZU
8.3%

Financial Services

FEP
9.8%
EZU
24.2%

Consumer Defensive

FEP
8.1%
EZU
5.6%

Utilities

FEP
7.1%
EZU
6.8%

Real Estate

FEP
5.2%
EZU
1.0%

Healthcare

FEP
4.8%
EZU
5.8%

Communication Services

FEP
3.7%
EZU
4.1%

Technology

FEP
3.0%
EZU
14.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEP vs. EZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEP
FEP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EZU
EZU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEP vs. EZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEPEZUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

1.16

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

1.70

+0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

1.50

+1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.71

5.42

+4.29

FEP vs. EZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the EZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEP and EZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEPEZUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.16

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.45

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.48

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.21

+0.13

Drawdowns

FEP vs. EZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEP drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum EZU drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEP and EZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEPEZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-65.32%

+19.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-13.06%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

-15.02%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.99%

-36.11%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.05%

-41.37%

-4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-1.14%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-19.24%

+7.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.60%

-0.48%

Volatility

FEP vs. EZU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) is 5.75%, while iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that FEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEPEZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

6.43%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.95%

14.12%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.73%

16.91%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

19.85%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

20.49%

+0.24%

FEP vs. EZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EZU's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEP vs. EZU - Dividend Comparison

FEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than EZU's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.67%2.85%2.90%2.56%2.79%2.46%2.13%2.84%3.47%1.91%3.07%2.18%
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
2.97%3.33%4.94%3.27%3.00%3.49%2.32%2.63%2.62%1.65%2.14%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FEP and EZU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZU has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to FEP (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEP dropped -46.05% vs EZU's -65.32%.

On 10-year performance, FEP leads with 10.27% vs 9.83% for EZU. On fees, EZU is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, FEP has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEP has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZU is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEP.

FEP has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 2.67% for EZU.

FEP tracks Defined Europe Index, while EZU tracks MSCI EMU. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEP and 0.51% for EZU.

FEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEP and EZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer