PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEP vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FEP vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FEP having a 7.28% return and ^GSPC slightly higher at 7.60%. Over the past 10 years, FEP has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 11.19%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


FEP

1D
-1.39%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
7.28%
6M
7.31%
1Y
27.23%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
11.19%

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEP vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEP
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund
7.28%55.72%3.38%16.85%-22.97%17.03%4.12%24.83%-19.00%36.27%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FEP and ^GSPC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2011

0.67

The correlation between FEP and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEP vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEP
FEP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEP Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEP vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEP^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.46

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

10.92

-2.27

FEP vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEP and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEP vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEP drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEP and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEP^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-56.78%

+10.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-9.10%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

-18.90%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.99%

-25.43%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.05%

-33.92%

-12.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-3.21%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.99%

-10.71%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.04%

+1.12%

Volatility

FEP vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund (FEP) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.89%. This indicates that FEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEP^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

4.89%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.58%

9.93%

+4.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.18%

12.57%

+4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

17.00%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.33%

18.08%

+2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEP and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEP has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to ^GSPC (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEP dropped -46.05% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEP and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer