FEOE vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FEOE (First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEOE returned 28.49% vs 50.76% for UMMA. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEOE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

FEOE vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEOE achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 29.52% return.

FEOE

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: 8.71%
• 6M: 9.01%
• 1Y: 28.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMMA

• 1D: -5.07%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 29.52%
• 6M: 30.57%
• 1Y: 50.76%
• 3Y*: 21.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEOE vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEOE First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF	8.71%	41.33%	-0.74%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	29.52%	26.65%	-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FEOE and UMMA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024	0.78

The correlation between FEOE and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEOE vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEOE	UMMA
Consumer Defensive	21.2%	5.0%
Industrials	14.7%	12.1%
Technology	14.4%	48.2%
Financial Services	13.2%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	7.3%
Basic Materials	10.2%	8.8%
Energy	7.1%	2.4%
Healthcare	4.0%	14.8%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.4%
Communication Services	0.7%	1.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FEOE vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEOE

FEOE Risk / Return Rank: 56
FEOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FEOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FEOE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FEOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FEOE Martin Ratio Rank: 50

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 70
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEOE vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEOE	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.24	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.88	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.40	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	3.42	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.02	13.07	-5.05

FEOE vs. UMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEOE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the UMMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEOE and UMMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEOE vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEOE drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEOE and UMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEOE	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-34.17%	+21.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.27%	-14.93%	+2.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.53%	-5.07%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.86%	-9.73%	+7.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	3.89%	-0.33%

Volatility

FEOE vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE) is 5.36%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 12.08%. This indicates that FEOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEOE	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	12.08%	-6.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.19%	20.30%	-7.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.11%	22.74%	-7.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.88%	21.08%	-5.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.88%	21.08%	-5.20%

FEOE vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEOE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEOE vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

FEOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than UMMA's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FEOE First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF	1.40%	1.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.95%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEOE and UMMA in my portfolio?

FEOE and UMMA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEOE or UMMA?

UMMA has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to FEOE (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEOE dropped -12.27% vs UMMA's -34.17%.

Which ETF is better, FEOE or UMMA?

On 1-year performance, UMMA leads with 50.76% vs 28.49% for FEOE. On fees, FEOE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FEOE has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEOE or UMMA?

Over the 1-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 50.76% return vs 28.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEOE or UMMA?

FEOE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEOE or UMMA?

FEOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.95% for UMMA.

What is the main difference between FEOE and UMMA?

They also come from different issuers: First Eagle and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEOE and 0.65% for UMMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.