FEOE vs. KEMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FEOE (First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FEOE is actively managed, while KEMX is passively managed. Over the past year, FEOE returned 32.06% vs 79.97% for KEMX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEOE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

FEOE vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEOE achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.

FEOE

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 11.79%
• 6M: 14.94%
• 1Y: 32.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEMX

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 13.02%
• YTD: 42.26%
• 6M: 47.92%
• 1Y: 79.97%
• 3Y*: 29.66%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEOE vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEOE First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF	11.79%	41.33%	-0.42%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	42.26%	38.28%	-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FEOE and KEMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	0.74

The correlation between FEOE and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEOE vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEOE	KEMX
Consumer Defensive	21.4%	3.0%
Industrials	15.3%	8.6%
Financial Services	13.4%	20.7%
Technology	12.7%	41.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.7%	5.4%
Basic Materials	10.4%	8.2%
Energy	8.0%	4.8%
Healthcare	3.8%	1.7%
Real Estate	2.6%	1.2%
Communication Services	0.7%	3.2%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

FEOE vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEOE

FEOE Risk / Return Rank: 61
FEOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FEOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FEOE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FEOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FEOE Martin Ratio Rank: 54

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 91
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEOE vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEOE	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	3.59	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	4.31	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.62	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	5.24	-2.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.34	20.86	-11.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEOE vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEOE Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEOE and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEOE	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	3.59	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.38	0.68	+1.70

Drawdowns

FEOE vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEOE drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEOE and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEOE	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-38.80%	+26.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.27%	-15.36%	+3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-1.31%	-1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-8.86%	+7.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	3.85%	-0.41%

Volatility

FEOE vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE) is 4.68%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that FEOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEOE	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	9.86%	-5.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	19.90%	-7.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.41%	22.40%	-7.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.63%	18.21%	-2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.63%	20.94%	-5.31%

FEOE vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEOE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEOE vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

FEOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than KEMX's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FEOE First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF	1.37%	1.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.31%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEOE and KEMX in my portfolio?

FEOE and KEMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEOE or KEMX?

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to FEOE (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEOE dropped -12.27% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

Which ETF is better, FEOE or KEMX?

On 1-year performance, KEMX leads with 79.97% vs 32.06% for FEOE. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FEOE has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEOE or KEMX?

Over the 1-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 79.97% return vs 32.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEOE or KEMX?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FEOE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEOE or KEMX?

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.37% for FEOE.

What is the main difference between FEOE and KEMX?

They also come from different issuers: First Eagle and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FEOE and 0.25% for KEMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.