FENY vs. PWRZ
FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. FENY is passively managed, while PWRZ is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FENY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRZ.
Performance
FENY vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FENY
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 19.38%
- YTD
- 28.29%
- 1Y
- 34.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 22.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FENY vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 3.05% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FENY and PWRZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FENY vs. PWRZ — Risk / Return Rank
FENY
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FENY vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FENY | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.34 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FENY vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FENY drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENY and PWRZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FENY | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.35% | -0.40% | -73.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.17% | -0.28% | -8.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.01% | -0.23% | -22.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | — | — |
Volatility
FENY vs. PWRZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FENY | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 11.81% | +9.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.34% | 11.81% | +14.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.79% | 11.81% | +17.98% |
FENY vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FENY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FENY vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison
FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.48% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FENY and PWRZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.
FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FENY and 0.75% for PWRZ.
Find the right allocation for FENY and PWRZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer