FENY vs. METL
FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FENY is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, while METL is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Sprott. FENY is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. FENY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
FENY vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FENY achieves a 31.48% return, which is significantly higher than METL's -6.10% return.
FENY
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 8.43%
- 6M
- 23.04%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 39.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 22.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.42%
METL
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -15.36%
- 6M
- -19.31%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FENY vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 31.48% | 3.78% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | -6.10% | 28.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FENY and METL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FENY vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
FENY
METL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FENY vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FENY | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FENY vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FENY drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENY and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FENY | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.35% | -28.80% | -45.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.92% | -28.80% | +21.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.00% | -10.00% | -13.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | — | — |
Volatility
FENY vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FENY | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.86% | 44.16% | -23.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 44.16% | -17.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.79% | 44.16% | -14.37% |
FENY vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FENY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FENY vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than METL's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.42% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 1.06% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FENY and METL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.06% for METL.
FENY is categorized as Energy Equities, while METL is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FENY and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for FENY and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer