FENY vs. LNGX
FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - FENY tracks the MSCI USA IMI Energy Index while LNGX tracks the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FENY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.
Performance
FENY vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FENY achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than LNGX's 20.47% return.
FENY
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 32.28%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 45.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 20.47%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FENY vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 32.28% | 2.00% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 20.47% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FENY and LNGX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FENY vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank
FENY
LNGX
FENY vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FENY | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FENY | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 2.10 | -1.90 |
Drawdowns
FENY vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FENY drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than LNGX's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENY and LNGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FENY | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.35% | -14.31% | -60.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -11.36% | +5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -4.37% | -18.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | — | — |
Volatility
FENY vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FENY | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 24.67% | -4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.46% | 24.67% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.80% | 24.67% | +5.13% |
FENY vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FENY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FENY vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison
FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than LNGX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.41% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FENY and LNGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.
FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.
FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy Index, while LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FENY and 0.45% for LNGX.
Find the right allocation for FENY and LNGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer