FENY vs. HAP
FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) and HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - FENY tracks the MSCI USA IMI Energy Index while HAP tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FENY returned 9.57%/yr vs 11.99%/yr for HAP. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FENY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for HAP.
Performance
FENY vs. HAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FENY achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than HAP's 21.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FENY has underperformed HAP with an annualized return of 9.57%, while HAP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.99% annualized return.
FENY
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 32.28%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 45.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
HAP
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 23.70%
- 1Y
- 46.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
FENY vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 32.28% | 7.27% | 6.62% | -0.04% | 62.94% | 55.62% | -33.15% | 9.11% | -19.99% | -2.30% |
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 21.49% | 34.91% | -4.08% | 2.46% | 7.84% | 25.04% | 6.30% | 18.60% | -10.68% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FENY and HAP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FENY and HAP has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FENY vs. HAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FENY
HAP
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
FENY
HAP
Basic Materials
FENY
HAP
Industrials
FENY
HAP
Communication Services
FENY
-
HAP
-
Consumer Cyclical
FENY
-
HAP
Consumer Defensive
FENY
-
HAP
Financial Services
FENY
-
HAP
-
Healthcare
FENY
-
HAP
Real Estate
FENY
-
HAP
Technology
FENY
-
HAP
Utilities
FENY
-
HAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FENY vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank
FENY
HAP
FENY vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FENY | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.56 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 5.65 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 23.05 | -11.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FENY | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 3.14 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.63 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.61 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.26 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
FENY vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FENY drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than HAP's maximum drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENY and HAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FENY | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.35% | -50.73% | -23.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -8.31% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | -16.92% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | -25.66% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | -44.07% | -25.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -1.95% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -12.03% | -11.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 2.03% | +1.96% |
Volatility
FENY vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) at 4.37%. This indicates that FENY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FENY | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 4.37% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 12.24% | +4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 14.91% | +5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.46% | 18.24% | +8.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.80% | 19.74% | +10.06% |
FENY vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FENY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
FENY vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison
FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than HAP's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.41% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.87% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FENY and HAP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FENY has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to HAP (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FENY dropped -74.35% vs HAP's -50.73%.
On 10-year performance, HAP leads with 11.99% vs 9.57% for FENY. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HAP has performed better with a 11.99% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HAP.
FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.87% for HAP.
FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FENY and 0.42% for HAP.
HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FENY and HAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer