FENY vs. FBCG
FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FENY is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FENY is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FENY returned 23.48%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for FBCG. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FENY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.
Performance
FENY vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FENY achieves a 32.87% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's 14.13% return.
FENY
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- YTD
- 32.87%
- 1Y
- 41.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 23.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.49%
FBCG
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 15.97%
- YTD
- 14.13%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.50M | $36.62M | $38.87M | |
| $48.28M | $43.61M | $52.27M |
FENY vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 32.87% | 7.27% | 6.62% | -0.04% | 62.94% | 55.62% | -3.36% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 14.13% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -39.10% | 21.34% | 41.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between FENY and FBCG is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.19 |
The correlation between FENY and FBCG shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FENY vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FENY
FBCG
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
FENY
FBCG
Basic Materials
FENY
FBCG
Industrials
FENY
FBCG
Utilities
FENY
FBCG
Communication Services
FENY
-
FBCG
Consumer Cyclical
FENY
-
FBCG
Consumer Defensive
FENY
-
FBCG
Financial Services
FENY
-
FBCG
Healthcare
FENY
-
FBCG
Real Estate
FENY
-
FBCG
Technology
FENY
-
FBCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FENY vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank
FENY
FBCG
FENY vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FENY | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.21 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 1.62 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.52 | 5.52 | +2.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FENY vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FENY drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than FBCG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENY and FBCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FENY | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.35% | -43.56% | -30.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.96% | -15.17% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | -27.89% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | -43.56% | +16.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -2.29% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.94% | -11.31% | -11.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.56% | 4.45% | +1.11% |
Volatility
FENY vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) is 6.24%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that FENY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FENY | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 7.02% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.54% | 16.72% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.87% | 20.77% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.17% | 26.13% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 25.75% | +4.03% |
FENY vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FENY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FENY vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison
FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.39% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FENY and FBCG have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBCG has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to FENY (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FENY dropped -74.35% vs FBCG's -43.56%.
On 5-year performance, FENY leads with 23.48% vs 13.42% for FBCG. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FENY has been the lower-risk option at 6.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FENY has performed better with a 23.48% return vs 13.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.
FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.
FENY is categorized as Energy Equities, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FENY and 0.59% for FBCG.
FENY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FENY and FBCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer