FENY vs. FBCG
FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FENY is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Energy Index, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FENY is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FENY returned 20.48%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for FBCG. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FENY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.
Performance
FENY vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FENY achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's 15.59% return.
FENY
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 32.28%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- 45.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
FBCG
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 7.84%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 39.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.60%
- 5Y*
- 15.84%
- 10Y*
- —
FENY vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 32.28% | 7.27% | 6.62% | -0.04% | 62.94% | 55.62% | -3.53% |
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 15.59% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -39.10% | 21.34% | 42.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FENY and FBCG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between FENY and FBCG shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FENY vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FENY
FBCG
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
FENY
FBCG
Basic Materials
FENY
FBCG
Industrials
FENY
FBCG
Communication Services
FENY
-
FBCG
Consumer Cyclical
FENY
-
FBCG
Consumer Defensive
FENY
-
FBCG
Financial Services
FENY
-
FBCG
Healthcare
FENY
-
FBCG
Real Estate
FENY
-
FBCG
Technology
FENY
-
FBCG
Utilities
FENY
-
FBCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FENY vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank
FENY
FBCG
FENY vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FENY | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 2.61 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 10.14 | +1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FENY | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.14 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.62 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.83 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
FENY vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FENY drawdown since its inception was -74.35%, which is greater than FBCG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENY and FBCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FENY | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.35% | -43.56% | -30.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -15.17% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | -27.89% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | -43.56% | +16.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -1.05% | -5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -11.49% | -11.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 3.90% | +0.09% |
Volatility
FENY vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 4.79%. This indicates that FENY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FENY | FBCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 4.79% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 13.89% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 18.55% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.46% | 25.79% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.80% | 25.72% | +4.08% |
FENY vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FENY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FENY vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison
FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.41% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FENY and FBCG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FENY has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to FBCG (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FENY dropped -74.35% vs FBCG's -43.56%.
On 5-year performance, FENY leads with 20.48% vs 15.84% for FBCG. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FENY has performed better with a 20.48% return vs 15.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.
FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.
FENY is categorized as Energy Equities, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FENY and 0.59% for FBCG.
FENY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FENY and FBCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer