FENI vs. MCSE
FENI (Fidelity Enhanced International ETF) and MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FENI returned 28.63% vs 4.30% for MCSE. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FENI charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCSE.
Performance
FENI vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FENI achieves a 13.37% return, which is significantly higher than MCSE's 1.12% return.
FENI
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 13.37%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.27%
MCSE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 0.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $50.45M | $59.07M | $59.10M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FENI vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FENI Fidelity Enhanced International ETF | 13.37% | 37.27% | 6.95% | 5.75% |
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF | 1.12% | 7.79% | -9.46% | 7.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FENI and MCSE is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FENI and MCSE has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FENI vs. MCSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FENI
MCSE
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FENI
MCSE
Industrials
FENI
MCSE
Technology
FENI
MCSE
Healthcare
FENI
MCSE
Consumer Defensive
FENI
MCSE
Consumer Cyclical
FENI
MCSE
Basic Materials
FENI
MCSE
Energy
FENI
MCSE
-
Utilities
FENI
MCSE
-
Communication Services
FENI
MCSE
Real Estate
FENI
MCSE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FENI vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank
FENI
MCSE
FENI vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced International ETF (FENI) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FENI | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.12 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 0.45 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 1.13 | +8.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FENI vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FENI drawdown since its inception was -14.20%, smaller than the maximum MCSE drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FENI and MCSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FENI | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.20% | -26.36% | +12.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -10.42% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -10.51% | +10.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -8.80% | +6.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 4.37% | -1.36% |
Volatility
FENI vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF (FENI) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that FENI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FENI | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 0.00% | +4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 1.87% | +12.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.36% | 10.29% | +6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 19.07% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 19.07% | -3.29% |
FENI vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FENI has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FENI vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison
FENI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENI Fidelity Enhanced International ETF | 2.88% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF | 3.74% | 3.78% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FENI and MCSE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FENI has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FENI dropped -14.20% vs MCSE's -26.36%.
On 1-year performance, FENI leads with 28.63% vs 4.30% for MCSE. On fees, FENI is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FENI has performed better with a 28.63% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FENI is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCSE.
MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.88% for FENI.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FENI and 0.59% for MCSE.
FENI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FENI and MCSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer