FEMZX vs. FKRCX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FEMZX (Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund) and FKRCX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund) are both mutual funds - FEMZX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKRCX is a Gold fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 5 years, FEMZX returned 3.62%/yr vs 22.35%/yr for FKRCX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.88% expense ratio.

Performance

FEMZX vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund (FEMZX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMZX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than FKRCX's -0.48% return.

FEMZX

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 3.59%
• 1Y: 14.47%
• 3Y*: 9.62%
• 5Y*: 3.62%
• 10Y*: —

FKRCX

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: -2.88%
• YTD: -0.48%
• 6M: -3.35%
• 1Y: 78.76%
• 3Y*: 50.97%
• 5Y*: 22.35%
• 10Y*: 14.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMZX vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEMZX Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund	2.45%	26.14%	-3.41%	12.35%	-10.28%	-5.45%	-7.20%	5.28%	-3.00%	6.69%
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	-0.48%	196.59%	17.64%	2.03%	-23.47%	-4.03%	44.30%	51.48%	-18.11%	-10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMZX and FKRCX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2017	0.35

The correlation between FEMZX and FKRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FEMZX vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMZX

FEMZX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FEMZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FEMZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FEMZX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FEMZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FEMZX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FKRCX

FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMZX vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund (FEMZX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEMZX	FKRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.69	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.07	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.29	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	2.15	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.67	5.97	+0.70

FEMZX vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMZX and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEMZX vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMZX drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMZX and FKRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMZX	FKRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.81%	-78.85%	+46.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.42%	-34.78%	+27.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.54%	-34.78%	+26.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.68%	-48.79%	+24.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.21%	-26.03%	+23.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-33.73%	+22.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	12.50%	-10.33%

Volatility

FEMZX vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund (FEMZX) is 2.21%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 16.62%. This indicates that FEMZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEMZX	FKRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	16.62%	-14.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.13%	37.79%	-31.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.05%	44.22%	-37.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.07%	34.29%	-26.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.41%	33.11%	-25.70%

FEMZX vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FEMZX and FKRCX have an expense ratio of 0.88%.

Dividends

FEMZX vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

FEMZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, less than FKRCX's 10.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FEMZX Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund	7.63%	7.26%	8.50%	6.12%	6.40%	9.12%	7.77%	9.83%	9.11%	3.60%	0.00%
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	10.80%	10.75%	13.44%	3.12%	0.00%	9.37%	10.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	8.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMZX and FKRCX in my portfolio?

FEMZX and FKRCX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEMZX or FKRCX?

FKRCX has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to FEMZX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMZX dropped -32.81% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEMZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.