FEMZX vs. DBLEX
FEMZX (Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund) and DBLEX (DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FEMZX returned 4.08%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for DBLEX. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FEMZX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for DBLEX.
Performance
FEMZX vs. DBLEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMZX achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly higher than DBLEX's 1.00% return.
FEMZX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 13.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.06%
DBLEX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.82%
- 10Y*
- 3.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FEMZX vs. DBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMZX Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund | 3.45% | 26.14% | -3.41% | 12.35% | -10.28% | -5.45% | -7.20% | 5.28% | -3.00% | 6.69% |
DBLEX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 1.00% | 8.39% | 8.20% | 9.64% | -15.30% | 1.97% | 4.85% | 11.80% | -3.20% | 7.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMZX and DBLEX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2017 | 0.38 |
The correlation between FEMZX and DBLEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMZX vs. DBLEX — Risk / Return Rank
FEMZX
DBLEX
FEMZX vs. DBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund (FEMZX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEMZX | DBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.15 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 8.34 | -2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEMZX vs. DBLEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMZX drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, which is greater than DBLEX's maximum drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMZX and DBLEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMZX | DBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.81% | -25.43% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.42% | -1.81% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.14% | -4.43% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.57% | -25.43% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -0.82% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -3.45% | -7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 0.47% | +1.76% |
Volatility
FEMZX vs. DBLEX - Volatility Comparison
Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund (FEMZX) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX) at 0.54%. This indicates that FEMZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMZX | DBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.84% | 0.54% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.18% | 1.63% | +4.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.10% | 2.12% | +4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.07% | 4.51% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 4.64% | +2.75% |
FEMZX vs. DBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMZX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than DBLEX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMZX vs. DBLEX - Dividend Comparison
FEMZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.80%, more than DBLEX's 5.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLEX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 5.11% | 5.59% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 4.77% | 4.00% | 4.37% | 4.57% | 3.83% | 4.33% | 4.54% | 5.21% |
FEMZX Templeton Sustainable Emerging Markets Bond Fund | 9.80% | 7.26% | 8.50% | 6.12% | 6.40% | 9.12% | 7.77% | 9.83% | 9.11% | 3.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMZX and DBLEX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEMZX has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to DBLEX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMZX dropped -32.81% vs DBLEX's -25.43%.
FEMZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEMZX and DBLEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer