FEMVX vs. COBYX
FEMVX (Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund) and COBYX (The Cook & Bynum Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, FEMVX returned 13.63%/yr vs 7.82%/yr for COBYX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEMVX charges 0.22%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for COBYX.
Performance
FEMVX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMVX achieves a 37.35% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 10.00% return.
FEMVX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 14.17%
- YTD
- 37.35%
- 6M
- 41.22%
- 1Y
- 70.43%
- 3Y*
- 31.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- —
COBYX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 10.00%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 13.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
FEMVX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMVX Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund | 37.35% | 33.95% | 11.68% | 17.43% | -16.98% | 6.02% | 35.70% |
COBYX The Cook & Bynum Fund | 10.00% | 20.50% | -10.32% | 16.73% | 9.28% | 9.05% | 19.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMVX and COBYX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between FEMVX and COBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMVX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank
FEMVX
COBYX
FEMVX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund (FEMVX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMVX | COBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.20 | 1.16 | +3.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.20 | 1.76 | +3.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.21 | +0.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.85 | 1.76 | +4.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.12 | 5.26 | +17.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMVX | COBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20 | 1.16 | +3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.57 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.39 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
FEMVX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMVX drawdown since its inception was -30.54%, smaller than the maximum COBYX drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMVX and COBYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMVX | COBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.54% | -34.18% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -8.95% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -16.29% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.54% | -17.10% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.78% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -6.80% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.99% | +0.09% |
Volatility
FEMVX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund (FEMVX) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.71%. This indicates that FEMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMVX | COBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 3.71% | +3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 9.46% | +5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 11.79% | +5.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 13.98% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 13.64% | +2.37% |
FEMVX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMVX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison
FEMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than COBYX's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COBYX The Cook & Bynum Fund | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 1.01% | 1.16% | 2.18% | 0.32% | 0.69% | 12.60% | 1.88% | 5.09% |
FEMVX Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund | 2.89% | 3.97% | 3.65% | 4.73% | 4.87% | 5.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMVX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEMVX has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to COBYX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMVX dropped -30.54% vs COBYX's -34.18%.
FEMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEMVX and COBYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer