FEMSX vs. FTMKX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FEMSX (Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund) and FTMKX (Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FEMSX returned 13.07%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for FTMKX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FEMSX charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for FTMKX.

Performance

FEMSX vs. FTMKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FEMSX having a 30.34% return and FTMKX slightly lower at 29.38%. Over the past 10 years, FEMSX has outperformed FTMKX with an annualized return of 13.07%, while FTMKX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.

FEMSX

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 30.34%
• 6M: 33.71%
• 1Y: 59.87%
• 3Y*: 27.65%
• 5Y*: 8.09%
• 10Y*: 13.07%

FTMKX

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: 4.51%
• YTD: 29.38%
• 6M: 31.75%
• 1Y: 61.27%
• 3Y*: 27.13%
• 5Y*: 8.14%
• 10Y*: 12.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMSX vs. FTMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	30.34%	37.92%	7.84%	14.23%	-23.95%	-5.14%	24.72%	28.87%	-16.20%	49.92%
FTMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M	29.38%	39.38%	8.73%	7.84%	-20.29%	-3.19%	29.65%	28.95%	-18.56%	46.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMSX and FTMKX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2008	0.97

The correlation between FEMSX and FTMKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEMSX vs. FTMKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMSX

FEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FTMKX

FTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMSX vs. FTMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEMSX	FTMKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.22	3.48	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	4.38	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.63	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.57	4.59	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.19	18.68	-0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEMSX vs. FTMKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is comparable to the FTMKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMSX and FTMKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEMSX	FTMKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.22	3.48	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.43	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.65	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.43	+0.14

Drawdowns

FEMSX vs. FTMKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMSX drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum FTMKX drawdown of -70.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMSX and FTMKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMSX	FTMKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.16%	-70.17%	+26.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.42%	-13.75%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.04%	-18.94%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.64%	-40.72%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.16%	-42.43%	-1.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.49%	-3.06%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.40%	-20.98%	+7.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	3.37%	-0.01%

Volatility

FEMSX vs. FTMKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX) have volatilities of 8.24% and 8.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEMSX	FTMKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.24%	8.33%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.54%	15.64%	+0.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.06%	18.14%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	18.94%	+0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.34%	18.83%	+0.51%

FEMSX vs. FTMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FTMKX's 1.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEMSX vs. FTMKX - Dividend Comparison

FEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than FTMKX's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	1.88%	2.45%	2.08%	2.82%	2.39%	12.83%	2.99%	2.48%	9.42%	8.98%	1.46%	1.27%
FTMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M	0.80%	1.04%	0.78%	0.98%	0.47%	4.58%	1.62%	10.48%	0.00%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMSX and FTMKX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FEMSX and FTMKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FEMSX or FTMKX?

FTMKX has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to FEMSX (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMSX dropped -44.16% vs FTMKX's -70.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 3.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.