FEMSX vs. FHKFX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FEMSX (Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund) and FHKFX (Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FEMSX returned 7.65%/yr vs 6.98%/yr for FHKFX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.01% expense ratio.

Performance

FEMSX vs. FHKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FEMSX having a 27.71% return and FHKFX slightly higher at 28.02%.

FEMSX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 27.71%
• 6M: 29.12%
• 1Y: 51.63%
• 3Y*: 26.43%
• 5Y*: 7.65%
• 10Y*: 13.13%

FHKFX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: 28.02%
• 6M: 29.11%
• 1Y: 51.49%
• 3Y*: 25.27%
• 5Y*: 6.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMSX vs. FHKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	27.71%	37.92%	7.84%	14.23%	-23.95%	-5.14%	24.72%	28.87%	-8.23%
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund	28.02%	38.51%	5.42%	12.10%	-24.50%	-4.15%	17.85%	9.64%	-8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMSX and FHKFX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018	0.98

The correlation between FEMSX and FHKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEMSX vs. FHKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMSX

FEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FHKFX

FHKFX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FHKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FHKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FHKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FHKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FHKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMSX vs. FHKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEMSX	FHKFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.40	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	2.94	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.45	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	4.15	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.48	14.70	-0.22

FEMSX vs. FHKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FHKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMSX and FHKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEMSX vs. FHKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMSX drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, roughly equal to the maximum FHKFX drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMSX and FHKFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEMSX	FHKFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.16%	-45.47%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.42%	-12.54%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.04%	-16.71%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.64%	-42.10%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.46%	-5.29%	+0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.37%	-17.12%	+3.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	3.53%	+0.06%

Volatility

FEMSX vs. FHKFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) have volatilities of 12.42% and 11.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEMSX	FHKFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.42%	11.99%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.89%	19.53%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.92%	21.77%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.66%	19.66%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	20.00%	-0.43%

FEMSX vs. FHKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FEMSX and FHKFX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FEMSX vs. FHKFX - Dividend Comparison

FEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than FHKFX's 1.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	1.92%	2.45%	2.08%	2.82%	2.39%	12.83%	2.99%	2.48%	9.42%	8.98%	1.46%	1.27%
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund	1.86%	2.38%	2.86%	2.43%	2.56%	3.46%	1.38%	2.28%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEMSX and FHKFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FEMSX and FHKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FEMSX or FHKFX?

FEMSX has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to FHKFX (11.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMSX dropped -44.16% vs FHKFX's -45.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.